Thursday, January 5, 2012

Perancang Demonstrasi "Kempen Bebaskan Anwar 901" Adalah Khawarij Qaidiyyah

Perancang Demonstrasi "Kempen Bebaskan Anwar 901" Adalah Khawarij Qaidiyyah

Perancang Demonstrasi "Kempen Bebaskan Anwar 901" Adalah Khawarij Qaidiyyah

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 11:32 AM PST

A Humble Submission – Looking back and looking forward (29.12.2011)

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 10:27 AM PST

Last year, in this very column, I shared my wishes for 2011.

My first wish was for greater constitutional awareness. While there is no way of measuring this, at least through the MyConstitution campaign organised by the Bar Council, we are able to gauge that the general public do want more knowledge about their Federal Constitution. The numerous activities undertaken by the campaign throughout 2011 is testament to this.

My second wish for 2011 was for the abolishment of draconian laws in the form of the Internal Security Act 1960 ("ISA"), the Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 ("EO") and Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measure) Act 1985. The three are known as the 'unholy trinity' of detention without trial legislation.

We will thankfully see the end of two – the ISA will be abolished sometime in March 2012, and the emergency declarations of 1966, 1969 and 1977 have meanwhile been annulled by Parliament on Dec 20, 2011. Six months thereafter, the EO will cease to have legal effect.

However, we have been told that legislations to replace these draconian laws are being drafted, and will continue provide for detention without trial. So even with the abolishment of the ISA and the annulment of the emergency declarations, we must remain vigilant to ensure the draconian nature of these legislations do not manifest itself in new laws. Preventive detention – whilst being a feature of many jurisdictions these days – must be for a specific purpose; terrorism. It cannot be a carte blanche power to punish extra-judiciously. We must also ensure that the injustices of the past can no longer be repeated in the future.

My third wish for 2011 was for better inter-faith relations, to mend the interfaith relationship that took a beating in 2010. Unfortunately, this wish of mine did not materialise. Christians in particular bore the brunt of the inter-religious aggravation. They have been accused with collaborating with communists to topple the government and have been accused of attempting to convert Muslims through a 'Christianisation' movement (gerakan Kristianisasi in Bahasa Melayu).

The climax of these tensions was the Jais raid on a church earlier this year as well as the Himpunan Sejuta Umat (Himpun) assembly of Muslim NGOs, purportedly to 'defend the Islamic faith' from this christianisation.

I will renew my wish for better interfaith relations in 2012 and in this I am heartened to see that the Christians of Malaysia have remained true to their teachings by reacting with calm, turning their collective cheeks and still loving their neighbours. There are also many Muslims who denounce this demonisation of their fellow countrymen. In this, I remain hopeful.

My last wish for 2011 was if general elections were called, we would vote for the right leaders to represent us in Parliament. 2011 came and will end without the dissolution of Parliament, but the elections will almost certainly be in 2012.

My hope will be carried over to 2012, that while we may not see less politics, we will at least see a more dynamic, robust and meaningful Parliament after the 13th General Elections.

Looking ahead, I hope for a better year in 2012 for our nation. My first hope is that the Peaceful Assembly Bill 2011, which has been passed by both Houses of Parliament, will be amended at the very least. A fortnight ago, I wrote of how this Bill is flawed and should be withdrawn. A withdrawal may be too late, but I truly hope that efforts are underway to amend the more severe aspects of the legislation.

I also hope that in 2012, we will finally see the proposed amendments to the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 (UUCA) to allow for the participation of students in politics. I have also wrote in this column of the landmark decision of the Court of Appeal in the UKM4 case and it is my wish that the decision will herald a new dawn in the movement to push for the constitutional rights of students, curtailed by the UUCA.

2012 will be an exciting year. The impending general elections and developments in the fundamental liberties of the rakyat will mean that socio-politico-legal commentators like me will have more than enough material to fill their columns. Let us hope that when I write again on this topic next year, it will reflect upon a good year for Malaysia.

*this article was first published on 29.12.2011 for The Star's iPad application for my column, A Humble Submission


Filed under: Legal


A Humble Submission – A flawed bill (15 December 2011)

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 10:17 AM PST

You know that a piece of proposed law is in trouble when as soon as it has been tabled in Parliament, it was almost immediately attacked. Even before full details of the Peaceful Assembly Bill 2011 ("PA2011") were available, the Malaysian Twitter community (better known as "Twitterjaya") was already abuzz with criticisms.

Soon after, the actual Bill was made available to public. Interested persons began trawling through the Bill. Thankfully, the Bill is not very long, there are only about 27 sections and 4 short schedules. Before long, concrete views about the Bill began to emerge as the media scrambled for analysis on the Bill.

My initial view of it was actually not as bad as some other early opinions of the Bill. Compared to the repressive (and unconstitutional) regime regulating public assemblies under Section 27 of the Police Act, the Bill looked like a step in the right direction. After all, the main selling point of the Bill is the fact that you would no longer need a police permit to hold a public assembly. Under PA2011, you only need to notify the police of the intended assembly. As the requirement of notification is an international norm, the movement from permit to notification would bring the country closer to international standards relating to public assemblies.

PA2011 is one of those laws that on the face of it looks progressive. For the less discerning, there would not be much that is wrong with the Bill. Yet, spend a bit more time with it and its many flaws will soon be apparent, so much so that taken as a whole, it would actually be more regressive than the current legislation.

The biggest (and some say most insidious) weakness of PA2011 is the outright ban against what is termed as 'street protest' under the Bill. This has been justified in order to 'protect the interests of other people who are affected by street protests', such as small business and motorists.

Yet, 'street protest' has been defined as 'an open air assembly which begins with a meeting at a specified place and consists of walking in a mass march or rally for the purpose of objecting to or advancing a particular cause or causes'. Effectively, this would potentially cover all forms of moving assemblies or processions, from the Bersih-type rallies to Maulidur Rasul or Thaipussam processions. An organiser or participant of such 'street protests' will be liable to a maximum fine of RM10,000.00. Under the current scheme in Section 27 of the Police Act, it is possible to hold a 'street protest' as defined by PA2011, subject to the issuance of a permit from the police. The banning of a 'street protest' is thus a clear step backwards for freedom of assembly. In addition, this outright prohibition would also be unconstitutional. Although the Federal Constitution allows for restrictions to be placed on freedom of assembly for certain specified purposes such as public order, such restrictions cannot amount to a total prohibition against the exercise of that right to freedom of assembly.

The outright prohibition against public assemblies at 'prohibited places' also attracted the same criticisms. Under the Bill, a public assembly cannot be held at such places or within 50 meters from the limit of such places. The Bill lists places such as schools, kindergartens, places of worship, hospitals, land public transport terminals, petrol stations, hospitals, railways, bridges and many other places as 'prohibited places'.

The list of prohibited places severely limits the areas in which a public assembly may be held, especially if it is in urban centers such as the Klang Valley. It would be difficult to find a place that is not within 50 meters of a petrol station, school, land public transport terminal or a place or worship in the Klang Valley. Many public events are held in places like the Bar Council or the PWTC yet these places because of their proximity to prohibited places can no longer host such events.

This also means that mundane, everyday activities can no longer take place in such prohibited places. An assembly as defined in the Bill is a means an 'intentional and temporary assembly of a number of persons in a public place, whether or not the assembly is at a particular place or moving'. Under PA2011, an assembly such as a school assembly, a church mass or Friday prayers can no longer be held as they would be held at a school or a place of worship. Remember, this would be an outright prohibition. Not even the police can grant permission to assemble in such prohibited places.

Surely this cannot be the intention of the government in drafting the Bill. Surely such jarring flaws merit a more thorough review of the proposed law.

Instead, for no rhyme or reason, the bill was approved. It was first tabled on 22 November 2011 and by 29 November 2011, it was passed by the Dewan Rakyat with amendments. Demands and pleas for the Bill to be referred to a Parliamentary select committee failed. It would appear that Malaysian must accept this Bill.

It is upon this backdrop that the Bar marched to Parliament on 29 November 2011 to present an alternative Peaceful Assembly Bill to the government. The alternative Bill was drafted by a team assembled by the Bar Council and lead by former Bar president Datuk Yeo Yang Poh. The team drafted the alternative bill in three days yet the product was superior to PA2011. It only took that many days because there is a raft of legislation in other jurisdictions to emulate. The drafters of PA2011 also took from these other jurisdiction, but instead of taking the best out of those other legislation, it would appear that it has been pieced together into a contradictory, regressive and ultimately flawed bill which does not give justice to the government's promise of democratic transformation.

*this article was first published on 15 December 2011 in The Star's iPad application for my column, A Humble Submission.


Filed under: Legal


UMNO/BN Gagal Uruskan Air Tidak Terhasil (NRW) – Negara Hilang Pendapatan RM4.99 Bilion !

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 09:45 AM PST

KUALA LUMPUR, 5 Jan: Malaysia telah kehilangan pendapatan disebabkan Non-Revenue Water (NRW) atau Air Tidak Terhasil dengan angka amat mengejutkan sebanyak RM4.99 billion bagi tahun 2008, 2009 dan 2010. Daripada angka itu, kehilangan pendapatan bagi tahun 2010 sahaja dianggarkan RM1.74 billion, ekoran kegagalan Kerajaan BN menguruskan NRW secara holistik. Presiden Persatuan Penyelidikan Air dan Tenaga Malaysia [...]


Dibawah UMNO Dan Mahathir, PERKIM Pun Tak Selamat, Pecah Amanah RM3.7 Juta, !

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 09:19 AM PST

KUALA LUMPUR 9 Jan: KEADILAN menuntut penjelasan Bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad berhubung isu  pecah amanah  RM3.7 juta membabitkan Pertubuhan Kebajikan Islam Malaysia (Perkim). Pengerusi Biro Pemahaman dan Pemantapan Agama KEADILAN (BIPPA), Ahmad Kasim berkata,  Mahathir selaku Pengerusi Perkim sepatutnya maklum mengenai projek menaiktaraf jalan bernilai RM270 juta, yang dikaitkan dengan penyelewengan itu. [...]


DAP Akui Anwar Memang Peliwat.

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 07:00 AM PST


Dalam pada Anwar menjelajah seluruh Negara mencari 'sokongan' 100,000 umat manusia pada 9 Januari; ada bigger concern di kalangan inner circle Anwar sebenarnya. Perkara yang paling dirisaukan adalah kegagalan mendapatkan komitmen PENUH – DAP dan PAS dalam usaha mengumpul 100,000 orang Isnin depan. Memang inner circle Anwar sangat risau kerana berdasarkan beberapa majlis penerangan baru-baru ini, komitmen PAS dan DAP sangat terhad.

Masyarakat Malaysia seluruhnya perlu ingat, DAP adalah antara rakan 'strategik' yang paling tidak perform di dalam perhimpunan Bersih 2.0. DAP sangat reserve dan hanya menghadirkan diri sebagai mencukupkan syarat. Itupun bukan komitmen yang penuh.


Pimpinan DAP dikatakan hanya berkumpulan di Mandarin Court dan tidakpun bersama-sama dalam Bersih 2.0 secara total.


Anwar risau kerana DAP sekali lagi macam tak bersungguh nak bersama dalam perhimpunan 9 Januari nanti. Anwar cukup risau.


Mungkin Anwar perlu membaca (berulang kali), artikel tulisan Pegawai Khas LIM GUAN ENG mengenai apa yang akan berlaku pada 9 Januari nanti. Biar blog ini rumuskan:-

  • In the first and most widely expected scenario, our protagonist will be found guilty. In all likelihood this will also entail a prison sentence long enough not only to strip him of his parliamentary seat, but also to ensure that he cannot contest for five years following his eventual release. In other words, it will be the death knell to his political career.
  • In a second and more unlikely scenario, Anwar will be acquitted. By some miraculous occurrence, the absurdities of the trial will be admitted for what it is and justice will be seen to be served. Or more realistically, some technical flaw will deem the case invalid thus providing no recourse other than to release him.
  • There is a third scenario that may occur. In this instance, Anwar will be convicted and sentenced. Except he will also be granted a stay of execution pending an appeal that will last even longer than the original trial. This will have the effect of branding him guilty, yet at the same time avoiding any unnecessary martyrdom. Though Anwar will be "free", he will remain severely handicapped and distracted.
  • In my mind, whatever happens, whether Anwar Ibrahim turns out to be the prime minister who will usher us into a new era of democratic reform and good governance, or whether he will become the sacrificial lamb that will pave the way for a peaceful revolution, the bottom line is that Malaysia is already on an irreversible path towards change. And while there is no doubt that Anwar has been pivotal in catalysing change in our country, there should also not be any doubt that change will happen, with or without him.


Nampaknya, DAP semakin menganggap Anwar sebagai LIABILITI kepada Pakatan Rakyat! Bak kata Zairil lagi, kalaupun Anwar TIDAK ADA lagi dalam kamus politik; DAP sudah sedia untuk menggalas amanah sebagai penggerak perubahan di Malaysia!


So, that's it? Kalau tak ada Anwar pun, DAP boleh shoulder the responsibility? Really? Nak harapkan siapa? Sakmongkol dan Aspan Alias?

DAP sudah sedia nak tinggalkan Anwar; PAS berani?-Gelagat Anwar

Video: SAMBUTAN KEMERDEKAAN 2011 - FERIZ OMAR EKSLUSIF DI TV AL-HIJRAH (Bahagian 1)

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 06:05 AM PST


SAMBUTAN KEMERDEKAAN 2011 - FERIZ OMAR EKSLUSIF DI TV AL-HIJRAH (Bahagian 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R22cWHaLqU

(Sent from Flipboard)


Sent from my iPad

Article: Bahaya fahaman Liberalisme-Pluralisme

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 06:05 AM PST


Bahaya fahaman Liberalisme-Pluralisme
http://www.pribumiperkasa.com/?p=7560

(Sent from Flipboard)


Sent from my iPad

Kalau dunia nak kiamat pun, janganlah kita jadi pembawa dalilnya

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 05:05 AM PST

Dalam kegawatan politik yang sedang dihadapi rakyat kini, banyak perkara yang dapat kita pelajari dan ianya melambangkan sikap dan nilai pemikiran masing-masing yang bermain dalam politik ini. Berbahas dalam politik tidak ada etikanya di sini. Kalau di negara maju mereka berbincang dan berbahas menggunakan isu yang sedang hangat diperkatakan ramai.

Tetapi di sini mereka berbincang tentang budi dan membalas budi walaupun yang berbudi itu sekarang sedang melencong jauh dari apa yang sepatutnya mereka lakukan dan perjuangkan. Kalau telah mendapat subsidi gigi palsu dari jabatan kesihatan mereka tidak boleh lagi menegur kerajaan yang korap itu dan wajib menyokong pimpinan yang melakukan korapsi itu.

Jika kita telah mendapat pinjaman untuk anak kita belajar ke luar negara, kita di minta jangan mempersoalkan apa-apa yang tidak baik yang dilakukan oleh kerajaan dan pimpinan. Rakyat di kurung pemikiran mereka semata-mata telah mendapat gigi palsu percuma dan pinjaman dan pembiayaan pelajaran anak-anak kita. Apabila termakan sedikit wang rakyat yang bukan pun wang BN atau pun UMNO, rakyat mesti duduk diam dan memerhatikan sahaja segala kerja rasuah dan salahguna kuasa oleh pihak yang memimpin.

Budaya ini telah dibentuk oleh UMNO sejak bertahun-tahun dahulu dan ini membuatkan orang Melayu tidak boleh berfikir jauh sedikit dari pemikiran mereka yang melakukan tekanan ini.

Telah banyak kali diperkatakan yang wang diberikan kepada rakyat itu adalah wang mereka sendiri. Kos gigi palsu itu dibiayai oleh pembayar cukai yang terdiri dari rakyat berbilang kaum dan agama serta rakyat yang menjadi ahli kepada parti kerajaan dan parti-parti pembangkang. Kos membiayai gigi palsu itu bukannya wang UMNO, malahan pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO yang mengeluarkan bantuan itu pun dibiayai oleh rakyat termasuk ahli PAS, DAP dan PKR.

Saya menulis ini kerana ramai yang menyuruh saya menulisnya kerana UMNO sedang berkempen yang segala bantuan itu adalah keperihatinan pemimpin kerajaan yang ada sekarang. Justru rakyat mesti mengundi parti kerajaan. Jika ini dilakukan terus-terusan maka elok cari formula supaya ahli-ahli kepada parti pembangkang itu tidak payah membayar cukai pendapatan kepada kerajaan dan membayar cukai jualan ke atas rokok yang di hisap oleh mereka yang telah menjadi ahli parti pembangkang.

Kalau ini dapat dilakukan maka barulah UMNO dan BN boleh mengaku yang wang pemberian untuk membiayai gigi palsu atau pinjaman pelajaran itu adalah hak UMNO untuk menagih sokongan melalui pemberian itu.

Oleh yang demikian maka kita tidak akan dapat melakukan perubahan walaupun wang negara kita telah di bawa keluar sebanyak RM1trillion sejak sepuluh tahun dahulu. Jika kita tidak melawan, segala kemungkaran ekonomi dan politik yang dilakukan oleh pimpinan kita, maka sampai bila-bila pun negara kita akan diperlakukan sekehendak hati pimpinan yang tidak jujur dan kita akan hanya menunggu kehancuran yang mungkin datang tidak berapa ketika sahaja lagi. Kemungkinan negara akan menghadapi pengalaman negara-negara kaya yang akhirnya tersungkur di hadapan mata masyarakat antarabangsa akan berlaku kepada negara kita.

Kalau kita tidak lakukan sesuatu maka cerita pemimpin menggunakan hampir RM2 billion untuk menyelesaikan perniagaan anaknya yang gagal, akan berlaku lagi. Negara perlu membeli kelengkapan senjata terus menerus untuk keselamatan negara. Jika tidak ada perubahan maka kita akan menanggung pembiayaan pembelian peralatan yang telah dinaikkan harga berlipat kali ganda untuk membayar 'kick back' kepada pihak yang bertanggungjawab dalam jumlah yang berbillion. Semuanya ini ditanggung oleh kita rakyat negara ini.

Itulah persepsi rakyat terhadap pemimpin-pemimpin parti yang memerintah kita. Baru-baru ini terbongkar isu NFC yang melibatkan Sharizat dan keluarganya. Sharizat telah diminta berhenti oleh banyak pihak kerana permasalahan yang beliau sedang hadapi. Sharizat membuat kenyataan, 'siapa dalam UMNO yang tidak bermasalah?' Kata-kata Sharizat itu selari dengan persepsi rakyat terhadap barisan kepimpinan hari ini.

Saya menyertai orang ramai yang telah merasakan keletihan mengikut perangai dan budaya UMNO ini. Kita disuruh menjadi rakyat yang setia tetapi mereka (pemimpin-pemimpin) tidak pernah menunjukkan sikap dan perasaan kesetiaan kepada negara tercinta ini.

Merekalah (pemimpin) yang telah menjadikan UMNO dan ahli-ahlinya serta rakyat yang telah di kelirukan itu untuk menjadi modal perniagaan peribadi mereka. Apabila ada rakyat yang berdegil tidak mahu menjadi modal kepada perniagaan peribadi mereka, rakyat gulungan ini dianggap sebagai pengkhianat pula sedangkan pengkhianat sebenar adalah di kalangan pimpinan yang mencuri wang rakyat dalam jumlah yang beratus billion ringgit nilainya.

Budaya dan pemikiran mereka (pemimpin-pemimpin) sudah terbalik. Yang benar dikatakan salah dan yang salah mereka katakan betul. Saya dan mereka yang sama pemikiran, tidak mahu menjadi gulungan yang menjadi pembawa dalil kedatangan kiamat.

Pembawa dalil kiamat selalunya bertindak dan mempunyai budaya serta pemikiran yang terbalik….yang baik nampak jahat dan yang jahat nampak baik. Yang hak terhimpit dan yang bathil bermaharajalela. Menuju ke jalan yang lurus tidak di gemari oleh mereka yang sedang berkuasa secara rakus.

Lagi pun Tuhan memberikan kita ingatan, 'selagi masih ada umat ku yang masih berzikir kepada ku, walaupun seorang, dunia belum lagi akan kiamat'

Demonstrasi "Kempen Bebaskan Anwar 901" Adalah Haram Bahkan SESAT

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 05:00 AM PST


KAJANG - Seorang penceramah muda, Ustaz Idris Sulaiman semalam telah menyifatkan Kempen Bebaskan Anwar pada tarikh 9 Januari 2011 depan adalah haram dan juga sesat bagi umat Islam.

Ini menurut beliau, umat Islam yang menentang pemerintah (khuruj) adalah terkeluar dari sunnah baginda Rasulullah saw bahkan ia akan membawa kepada kesesatan.

Ustaz tersebut juga mendakwa, umat Islam yang mati didalam keadaan khuruj, dikhuatiri ia akan mati didalam keadaan jahiliyah kerana perbuatannya menentang pemerintah.

Bagi beliau, demonstrasi itu sendiri adalah satu perbuatan yang menentang pemerintah/kerajaan disesebuah negara.

Dan menurut beliau lagi, tiada satupun dalil yang dinyatakan didalam Islam bagi menghalalkan perbuatan berdemonstrasi selain ianya hanya tipu daya kafir untuk menjatuhkan pemimpin Islam disesebuah negara.

Pada 9 Januari ini, pihak Pakatan Rakyat bercadang untuk berhimpun seramai 100 ribu orang dihadapan bangunan Mahkamah dimana keputusan bagi kes Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim akan diperdengarkan.

Pihak Polis Kuala Lumpur telah mengeluarkan kenyataan menegah orang ramai dari menghadiri perhimpunan tersebut kerana ia tidak mendapat permit dan juga dikhuatiri akan menimbulkan kekecohan.-Utaranews

Student revolt: Taking cue from Anwar 1974

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 06:44 AM PST

On December 3, 1974, Anwar Ibrahim led student protests against what he claimed as 'rural poverty and hunger'. His ticket for such massive demonstrations was a fabricated news that a family in Baling, Kedah died of hunger.

He was arrested under the Internal Security Act (ISA) and sent to Kamunting for 20 months. After joining Umno in 1982, he became the only politician who braced no real test to his elevation - from Minister of Culture, Sports and Youth to becoming the second man to Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in 1993.

But he never parted with students' movement. His aura in student politics remains strong, to the present time as undergraduates still see him as a stately leader, amid his lies for organising the demonstrations in 1974.

Our students nowadays are easily led. They are most gullible. As student movements worldwide have only proven to be disastrous and against many laws, they still chose to jump into the bandwagon, with no solid reason or any tangible motive.

They are happy to join any demonstration and create their own. To them, this is a hallmark to their era as undergraduates - to gain the role as a protagonist in students' movement, or students' liberty.

And to strengthen their cause, they created bonds with similar movements abroad. The Indonesian student movement, known as among the most notorious in the region, is already making its impact on our students. There are already news portals, websites and blogs being co-organised by Malaysian and Indonesian student leaders. The Higher Education Ministry, Home Ministry and Ministry of Information, Communication and Culture must check this out.

Anwar continues to become the mentor of undergraduates. Education and scroll aside, they got so tempted with aggressive politics. While their demonstration is an incommode to public order, they use their position in campus to audaciously attack the government. Taking to the streets is becoming a common norm of democracy, as being shown by the Opposition.

And so, they became the Trojan horse of the Opposition.

During the Bersih 2.0 street demos, about 2,000 undergraduates took part, according to official records. They were paid between RM50 and RM100 by the organiser or those who supported the organiser. In some cases, students from as far as Kelantan, Sabah, Sarawak, Penang and Johore were provided with accommodation about one week before the rally.

So cheap is their dignity to be bought by the Opposition. But their leaders are the proud ones, having managed to pool suport - not for the demonstration - but for them.

So, who got the credit when about 70 students launched a rampage at UPSI last week? Of course, their leaders. Although the turnout was small, they were proud enough to have caused alarm to the police, the other students and in getting headlines in the newspapers and television.

And they lied too, just like Anwar Ibrahim. They accused the police of bashing them up, as Anwar did when he tripped at KL Sentral during Bersih 2.0. Anwar, on the other hand, is a smart politician. He is very tactical. However, the students are just a bunch of copycats. When people took to the street, they just joined in. When the Opposition antagonised the government, they quickly turned into a group of meek.

But we cannot undermine them from now on. Student movements in Malaysia are getting more support from the Opposition and from foreign organisations. If we fail to curtail them, their street demos would turn into an 'uprising' and a 'revolt'.

This is the 'renaissance' Anwar once propagated, and the upsurge of student movements is part of it. Student leaders are labelled as rogues in many countries, including Indonesia, South Korea, Japan and Europe. In the United States, students uprising usually met with stiff counter mechanism of the authority.

And come January 9 - the day when Kuala Lumpur High Court decides on Anwar's fate - we can expect more undergraduates to storm the Court and join the Oppposition for 901 rally to 'free Anwar'.

So, how are we going to deal with the students? Catch them and call up their parents?

NFC scandal: Focus on main players

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 02:15 AM PST

The NFC project development is indeed puzzling as to who is being accused of the misappropriation of funds and misuse of power. Shahrizat was not the minister who allocated the project to Salleh, her husband. Who was the minister of agriculture at that point of time? This is the person first who should be held [...]


The Truth Revealed : Anwar Ibrahim & the Color Revolutions.

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 01:42 AM PST

The Thais had their share of Red shirts seizing control of Bangkok SuwarnaBhumi International Airportand subsequently changing the Thai's leadership. We in Malaysia are challenged by the Bersih Movement that seeks for so called "Electoral reforms".
Photo: Thaksin Shinawatra, a long time servant of the global elite, since before even becoming Thailand's prime minister in 2001, reports to the CFR in New York City on the eve of the 2006 military coup that ousted him from power. He has now returned to power in Thailand via a proxy political party led by his own sister, Yingluck Shinawatra. Securing the votes of only 35% of eligible voters puts on full display how tenuous his support really is within a nation he claims stands entirely behind him.


Malaysia would also see color revolution take to their streets - this time in Malaysia by the yellow-clad, NED-funded Bersih movement. The official NED website listed four NGOs receiving funds for their operations in Malaysia. They are the IRI ($400,000), Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd ($100,000), NDI – National Democratic Institute for International Affairs ($322,500) and Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd – SUARAMA ($85,000). According to a source within PKR, the IRI infiltrated the PKR (formerly Parti Keadilan Nasional) since 1998 but its direct involvement only began after Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was released from prison in 2004.


What is the significant of Thai's Red Shirts and Malaysia's Yellow Shirts ? They are part of a bigger global movement known as the "Colour Revolutions".

Color revolutions are, without a doubt, one of the main features of global political developments today. Should the casual reader immediately wonder what a "color revolution" is, keep reading, our view here is unique, but we most certainly have some answers.

Let us first begin with the Wikipedia definition. That website introduces the concept by stating the following:

"Color revolution(s) is a term used by the media to describe related [political] movements that developed in several societies in the CIS (former USSR) and Balkan states during the early 2000s. Some observers have called the events a revolutionary wave.
"Participants in the color revolutions have mostly used nonviolent resistance, also called civil resistance. Such methods as demonstrations, strikes and interventions have been [used to] protest against governments seen as corrupt and/or authoritarian, and to advocate democracy; and they have also created strong pressure for change.

These movements all adopted a specific color or flower as their symbol. The color revolutions are notable for the important role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and particularly student activists in organizing creative non-violent resistance.

"These movements have been successful in Serbia (especially the Bulldozer Revolution of 2000), in Georgia's Rose Revolution (2003), in Ukraine's Orange Revolution (2004), in Lebanon's Cedar Revolution and (though more violent than the previous ones) in Kyrgyzstan's Tulip Revolution(2005), in Kuwait's Blue Revolution (2005), in Iraq's Purple Revolution (2005), and in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution (1989), but failed in Iran's Green Revolution(2009–2010) .

Each time massive street protests followed disputed elections or request of fair elections and led to the resignation or overthrow of leaders considered by their opponents to be authoritarian."

What the Wikipedia article fails to mention is the massive foreign funding, and at least any notion that color revolutions are psychosocial operations of deception.

It's a fact that Western governments (especially the US government) and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) spend millions of dollars to co-opt and "channel" local populations of targeted countries against their own political leadership.

Empty democracy slogans and flashy colors aside, we argue that color revolutions are good old-fashioned regime change operations: destabilization without the tanks.

The secret ingredient is a sophisticated science used to manipulate emotions and circumvent critical thinking. History shows that, to much of the power elite, humanity is seen as a collection of nerve endings to be pushed and pulled one way or the other, sometimes made to tremble in fear, sometimes made to salivate like Pavlov's dogs. These days the manipulation is so pervasive, so subtle, so effective, that even critical individuals at times must necessarily fail to recognize how often--or in what context--they have fallen prey.

Of course fear is the most obvious emotion played upon to effect massive social change. One need only to reflect upon the last ten years, since 9/11, to know that fear is a primary instrument used to initiate and justify dangerous shifts in public policy.

But as humanity has been physiologically equipped with a range of emotions, and is not merely arrested and controlled by fear alone, a strata of behavioral and political science also found it useful to master the flip-side of the behavioral spectrum, and by that we mean desire, and all that drives groups of individuals to act, even in the face of fear, in pursuit of something worthwhile.

Many are the professions that utilize this type of understanding, including (but not limited to) marketing, advertising, public relations, politics and law-making, radio, television, journalism and news, film, music, general business and salesmanship; each of them selling, branding, promoting, entertaining, sloganeering, framing, explaining, creating friends and enemies, arguing likes and dislikes, setting the boundaries of good and evil: in many cases using their talents to circumvent their audiences' intellect, the real target being emotional, oftentimes even subconscious. Looking beneath the facade of the color revolutionary movement we also find a desire-based behavioral structure, in particular one that has been built upon historical lessons offered by social movements and periods of political upheaval.


It then makes sense that the personnel of such operations include perception managers, PR firms, pollsters and opinion-makers in the social media. Through the operational infrastructure, these entities work in close coordination with intelligence agents, local and foreign activists, strategists and tacticians, tax-exempt foundations, governmental agencies, and a host of non- governmental organizations. Collectively, their job is to make a palace coup (of their sponsorship) seem like a social revolution; to help fill the streets with fearless demonstrators advocating on behalf of a government of their choosing, which then legitimizes the sham governments with the authenticity of popular democracy and revolutionary fervor.



Because the operatives perform much of their craft in the open, their effectiveness is heavily predicated upon their ability to veil the influence backing them, and the long-term intentions guiding their work.

Their effectiveness is predicated on their ability to deceive, targeting both local populations and foreign audiences with highly-misleading interpretations of the underlying causes provoking these events.
And this is where we come in: to help deconstruct the deception.

But we will not just cover color revolutions here, as color revolutions are bound up in the larger geopolitical universe. A color revolution is only an instrument of foreign policy--only a tool--the ultimate object being the geopolitical advantages gained by powerful financiers and the brain trust they employ. It follows that understanding geopolitical context (and motive) is necessary to understanding the purpose of the color revolution.


Toward that end, we will discuss and analyze relationships of global power in great detail. We will highlight specific institutions of power; identify what their power rests upon; draw attention to the individuals that finance and direct their activities; speculate upon some of their motives; and get to know the broad range of tools they use to achieve them, tools which include the color revolution.

As in-depth studies into the color revolution are far too rare, and as the issue itself is far too obscure, we hope to draw more attention to it; to spark discussion and even debate.

It is an issue that takes time and patience. And it is for those that are willing to provide this time and patience that we offer all of you who visit this blog nothing but the truth.

"Never utter these words: 'I do not know this, therefore it is false.' One must study to know; know to understand; understand to judge." . The Truth Revealed !-Datuk Tajul Urus



Court grants injunction to stop Felda co-op EGM

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 01:30 AM PST

KUANTAN, Jan 4 — The High Court here today granted an injunction sought by four members of Koperasi Permodalan Felda Malaysia (KPF) to stop its extraordinary general meeting tomorrow that will decide the public listing of Felda Global Ventures Holding (FGVH) on the Bursa Malaysia. The injunction was filed in Temerloh on December 23 by [...]


TALQIN 901

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 01:22 AM PST

(Alahai Jah! Kain kapan aku dah siap lum Jah! Dema nak talqin dah tu!)

Salam 2 all.

Teman melihat betapa terdesak Anwar akhir-akhir ini bila melihat depan matanya "Bukit Segambut kata pergi, Sg Buloh kata mari"! Talqin buat karier politik Anwar semakin kuat bergema! Paku terakhir keranda kerier politik Anwar sudah mahu dipasak!

Tarikhnya makin dekat. Keputusan Mahkamah yang dijadualkan pada 09 Jan 2012 ini, hanya tinggal 3-4 hari sahaja lagi. Anwar tahu kali ini kalau kena hukum, dia akan meringkok dalam penjara sekurang-kurangnya 10-12 tahun penjara. Dengan umur sudah mencapai 65, campur 10-12 tahun dalam penjara, Anwar tahu kalau tidak mati pun, dia akan reput dalam penjara!

Sudah pasti Anwar kini berada dalam ketakutan yang teramat sangat. Putrajaya yang dimimpikan, Sg. Buloh yang mendatang!

Sebab itu Anwar lancarkan kempen terdesak dia: Bebas 901! Teman menerima maklumat daripada rakan dalaman PKR yang esok Khamis 05 Januari 2012 Anwar akan panggil semua wakil rakyat (MP & ADUN) Pakatan biaDAP, PKR & PAS berhimpun di Hotel DePalma, Ampang untuk memberi penerangan tentang kes dia meliwat Saiful! Seorang pensyarah undang-undang dengar khabarnya akan membentangkan kertas kerja mengenai kedudukan politik Anwar dari segi undang-undang!

Sebab ramai yang sudah mula persoalkan kedudukan Anwar jika disabit kesalahan. Dan mereka nampak jelas Anwar pasti kena kali ini, sebab Anwar langsung tidak membela diri dia. Tambahan apabila ada kenyataan dalam Mahkamah menyatakan bahawa liwat yang berlaku antara Anwar dan Saiful adalah atas dasar suka sama suka!

Masadepan Anwar sebagai bakal Perdana Menteri ketujuh sudah terlalu gelap! Gerhana penuh politik Anwar sudah berlaku! Talqin untuk Anwar sudah mula dibaca! Paku terakhir keranda politik Anwar sudah diketuk!

Sebab itu Anwar mahu rakyat membela dia di mahkamah jalanraya. Sebab itu mahasiswa dan pelajar juge diheret sama untuk membela dia dijalanraya. Saya mahu dibela di Mahkamah Jalanraya, begitu lalakan Anwar! Anwar tahu dia tidak akan menang dalam pilihanraya, maka dia perlu mendapat kuasa melalui politik jalanraya!

Persoalannya, adakah wajar rakyat, pelajar, mahasiswa dan lain-lain diheret dan diperdaya untuk membela Anwar di jalanraya, kononnya di Mahkamah Jalanraya?

JAWAPANNYA TIDAK WAJAR! TIDAK PATUT!

Kerana apa? Disini teman perturunkan 10 sebab mengapa tidak wajar rakyat membela Anwar dijalanraya! Malah Mahkamah Rakyat wajib memakukan paku terakhir keatas keranda politik Anwar Bin Ibrahim!

1. Mengapa Anwar tidak membela diri dia sendiri dalam Mahkamah. Semasa diberi peluang membela diri, Anwar memilih tidak mahu memberi keterangan bersumpah. Dalam kes tahun 1998, Anwar berani angkat sumpah dalam Mahkamah dan memberi keterangan bersumpah. Memberi butiran apa yang dia dakwa konspirasi. Soalan Hakim dijawab, soalbalas Pendakwaraya dipatahkan!

Tapi kali ini, Anwar langsung tidak angkat sumpah dalam Mahkamah! Anwar langsung tidak memberi keterangan bersumpah! Peluang terbuka luas depan Anwar untuk membela diri dia. Tapi tidak mengambil peluang tersebut!

Tapi teman faham, sebagai peguam teman tahu Anwar tersepit. Berlainan dengan kes 1998 bilamana polis kurang bukti. Setakat sebutir tilam untuk buktikan liwat. Kes liwat Saiful kali ini ada videoklip CCTV Anwar berada di kondominium tersebut, ada catatan saksi nampak Anwar ditempat kejadian, ada kesan airmani dalam dubur Saiful, malah DNA Anwar dikesan dalam dubur Saiful, bukan atas tilam macam kes liwat Azizan!

Dalam keadaan itu, Anwar mengambil jalan selamat dengan langsung tidak angkat sumpah dalam Mahkamah dan memberi keterangan bersumpah. Dengan cara itu, Hakim tidak boleh tanya soalan, Pendakwaraya tidak boleh soal-balas. Anwar selamat daripada disoal-siat, Anwar selamat daripada dilondehkan dalam kandang saksi!

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Anwar sendiri tidak membela diri dia dalam Mahkamah, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

2. Mengapa Wan Azizah, Presiden PKR yang juga bini Anwar tidak datang membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah. Sedangkan nama Wan Azizah disenaraikan sebagai saksi pembelaan Anwar? Adakah Wan Azizah tidak yakin dengan "kesucian" Anwar?

Bukankah Wan Azizah yang isytihar Anwar sebagai manusia anugerah tuhan? Bukankah Wan Azizah sanggup berbohong Anwar hendak ditembak mati sebab itu Anwar perlu lari ke Turki tidak lama selepas Saiful membuat lapuran polis mengadu diliwat Anwar? Bukankah Wan Azizah sanggup berbohong jam Omega ada pada dia untuk melindungi kegiatan pelacuran Anwar dengan China-DOLL yang didedahkan oleh Datuk Eskay kawan baik Anwar sendiri?

Mengapa tiba-tiba dalam kes meliwat Saiful, Wan Azizah tidak menggunakan peluang membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah? Mengapa Karpal Singh tidak panggil Wan Azizah sebagai saksi memberi keterangan membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah!

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Wan Azizah, Presiden PKR dan bini Anawr sendiri tidak membela diri Anwar dalam Mahkamah, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

3. Mengapa Azmin Ali, Timbalan Presiden PKR yang juga anak emas Anwar tidak membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah!

Dalam kes liwat 1998, Azmin Ali sanggup beri keterangan bersumpah dalam Mahkamah. Malah Azmin sanggup dikenakan pertuduhan menipu dan berbohong kerana memberi keterangan palsu dalam Mahkamah dalam kes liwat 1998!

Malahan Azmin buat kenyataan sanggup pecahkan tembok penjara demi membebaskan insan tersayang!

Mengapa Azmin tidak menjadi saksi membela Anwar dalam perbicaraan meliwat Saiful? Kenapa Karpal Singh sebagai peguam Anwar tidak panggil Azmin sebagai saksi untuk membela Anwar? Sedangkan sebagai orang yang rapat dengan Anwar, sebagai orang kanan yang kata pepatah "tidur sebantal baring sekatil" dengan Anwar, sudah tentu Azmin patut tahu pelbagai perkara tentang Anwar termasuk karakter Anwar. Kenapa tidak pergi ke Mahkamah dan yakinkan Mahkamah mengenai karekter & akhlak Anwar!

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau orang kanan Anwar saperti Azmin sendiri tidak membela diri Anwar dalam Mahkamah, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

4. Mengapa Anwar menggunakan khidmat Karpal Singh untuk membela dia dalam kes liwat di Mahkamah ini?

Sedangkan pada 22 Okt 1997, Karpal Singh yang mendedahkan dalam Parlimen dia ada bukti Anwar seorang peliwat! Dalam ucapan di Federal Hotel selepas itu, Karpal Singh menyatakan dia ada bukti dan dokumen Anwar kaki liwat! Ucapan dan pendedahan Karpal itu menyebabkan ada pemimpin PAS memanggil Anwar dengan gelarana "Sheikh Anwar Al-Juburi"!

Bukan itu sahaja, Karpal Singh sebenarnya adalah peguam mangsa liwat kes 1998 Azizan Abu Bakar & pendedah kes itu iaitu Umi Hafilda!

Mengapa tiba-tiba Anwar mengambil Karpal Singh menjadi peguam dia bagi kes liwat Saiful tahun 2008? Mana pergi Raja Aziz Addruse, Haji Sulaiman Abdullah, Pawancheek Marican, Zainur Zakaria dan lain-lain?

Adakah kerana itu ada cadangan di Mahkamah kes liwat Anwar dengan Saiful ialah atas dasar suka sama suka, bukan dipaksa? Kot mane pun, liwat tetap berlaku, walaupun suka sama suka?

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Anwar sendiri mengambil Karpal Singh yang menuduh dia meliwat tahun 1997 untuk menjadi loyer dia bagi kes 2008 mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

5. Mengapa Anwar tidak membela diri dia dalam mahkamah dengan membuktikan alibi dia, kononnya dia tidak ada ditempat kejadian meliwat Saiful itu? Kenapa saksi alibi tidak dipanggil memberi keterangan?

Kenapa Haji Hasanudin, tuanpunya kondominium yang juga kawan Anwar tidak dipanggil? Kenapa Mokhtar, pengawal peribadi Anwar yang juga adik ipar dia tidak dipanggil? Kenapa Mohd. Sani, pemandu Anwar yang sudah berbelas tahun berkhidmat dengan Anwar tidak dipanggil? Kenapa Wan Azizah isteri Anwar sendiri tidak dipanggil? Sedangkan mereka semua adalah saksi yang disenaraikan sebagai saksi alibi? Mengapa mereka tidak datang memberi keterangan membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah, sedangkan mereka ini semua rapat dengan Anwar?

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau orang-orang yang rapat dengan Anwar sendiri tidak membela diri Anwar dalam Mahkamah, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

6. Mengapa Anwar dan Karpal Singh tidak panggil Rahimi, pegawai khas Anwar sendiri membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah!

Sedangkan Rahimi yang memperkenalkan Saiful kepada Anwar dan membawa Saiful bekerja sebagai pembantu pejabat Anwar.

Rahimi dikatakan telah membuat Surat Akuan Sumpah kononnya mengaitkan Dato' Sri Najib dengan kes liwat Saiful. Malahan Surat Akuan Sumpah Rahimi itu diperakui oleh YB Wee Choo Keong, Ahli Parlimen PKR Wangsa Maju!

Malang bagi Anwar, apabila Rahimi pegawai khas dia sendiri bertukar haluan dan membuat lapuran polis yang dia disuruh membuat Surat Akuan Sumpah palsu untuk cuba mengaitkan Dato' Sri Najib. Malah YB Wee Choo Keong sendiri mengesahkan perkara itu! Tidak cukup dengan itu, YB Wee Choo Keong memilih keluar daripada PKR, dan kini menjadi Ahli Parlimen Bebas!

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau pegawai khas Anwar sendiri, bukan sahaja tidak membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah, malah membuat repot polis dipaksa buat Surat Akuan Sumpah Palsu, dan YB Wee Choo Keong yang mengesahkan Surat Akuan Sumpah palsu itu pun sampai keluar parti, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

7. Mengapa Anwar tidak mengambil kesempatan membela diri dia dengan memberikan sampel darah untuk menafikan DNA air mani yang ditemui didalam dubur Saiful.

Kes kali ini berbeza dengan kes liwat Azizan tahun 1998, kerana tahun itu DNA Anwar ditemui atas tilam bertompok yang berusia lebih 6 tahun!

Kali ini DNA airmani Anwar ditemui dalam dubur Saiful yang berusia 2 hari. Saiful diliwat 26 Jun 2008, dan membuat repot polis dan diperiksa doktor pada 28 Jun 2008! Tidak sampai 48 jam! Dan DNA airmani Anwar ini disahkan oleh ramai saksi: pakar forensik, perubatan, doktor dan lain-lain! Tak saperti kes tahun 1998 bila ianya hanya disahkan oleh seorang ahli kimia Lim Kong Boon!

Kalau benar dakwaan pembelaan Anwar bukan airmani dia didalam dubur Saiful, mengapa Anwar tidak berani memberikan sampel darah dia untuk diperiksa sebagai perbandingan DNA! Bukankah kalau ujian darah itu membuktikan DNA airmani dalam dubur Saiful itu bukan DNA Anwar, itu adalah pembelaan yang bukan sahaja hebat, malah boleh membebaskan Anwar serta merta. Silap-silap Kerajaan pun boleh tumbang!

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Anwar sendiri tidak menggunakan peluang mengemukakan sampel darah DNA dia untuk membela diri sendiri dalam Mahkamah, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

8. Anwar mendakwa kononnya pertuduhan dia meliwat staf dia Saiful adalah konspirasi Dato' Sri Najib. Konon ceritanya Saiful berjumpa dengan YAB PM!

Malah Anwar sampai nak sapina YAB PM untuk memberi keterangan. Yang peliknya dia sendiri tak mau beri keterangan bersumpah untuk membela diri. Tau-tau dia nak paksa YAB PM beri keterangan untuk pembelaan dia!

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Anwar sendiri tidak mahu memberi keterangan bersumpah membela diri dia dalam Mahkamah, sebaliknya memaksa YAB PM pulak memberi keterangan untuk pembelaan dia; mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

9. Kalau alasan Anwar membela diri dengan memanggil YAB sebagai saksi kononnya kerana Saiful berjumpa dengan YAB Dato' Sri Najib, mengapa Anwar tidak mahu memanggil YB Senator Ezam Mohd Nor yang juga ditemui Saiful!

Malahan YB Senator Ezam telah membuat kenyataan terbuka menyatakan Saiful ada datang bertemu dengan dia. Dan Ezam menyatakan dia bersedia dipanggil sebagai saksi untuk pembelaan kes Anwar!

Persoalannya, mengapa Anwar tidak menggunakan peluang itu untuk pembelaannya! Mengapa YB Senator Ezam, antara orang yang paling rapat dengan Anwar langsung tidak dipanggil sebagai saksi?

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Anwar sendiri tidak menggunakan peluang memanggil YB Senator Ezam sebagai saksi untuk membela diri dia dalam Mahkamah, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

10. Anwar menyatakan bahawa dia membela diri dengan mahukan Mahkamah Rakyat menentukan kesalahan dia!

Persoalannya, kenapa Anwar tidak serahkan pembelaan dirinya kepada Mahkamah ALLAH!

Iaitu dengan bersumpah laknat! Sebagaimana yang dibuat oleh Saiful sendiri.

Saiful telah bersumpah dengan menyatakan "bahawa saya Saiful telah diliwat oleh Anwar Ibrahim yang memasukkan zakarnya kedalam dubur saya, jika palsu dakwaan saya maka laknat ALLAH atas diri dan keluarga saya"!

Begitu berani Saiful menyerahkan pembelaan dia kepada ALLAH Rabbul Jalil. Dan ramai pengikut taksub Anwar berharap Saiful akan dilaknat. Malah ada yang bawa cerita konon Saiful dah kena sopak, kena angin ahmar, mulut berbuih, lumpuh seluruh badan dan macam-macam lagi.

Tau-tau keluar gambar-gambar Saiful berdahi hitam sedang bertawaf di Masjidil Haram. Muncul gambar Saiful berdoa diatas Jabal Nur di Gua Hira' mengadap Ka'bah! Pengikut taqsub Anwar semuanya terkedu bisu dan terkentut!

Sebaliknya Anwar masih dengan keingkaran dan keengganan dia untuk membela diri dengan bersumpah laknat! Apa yang Anwar takut sangat? Tak percaya kepada ALLAH? Atau takut laknat ALLAH diturunkan?

Jadi rakyat kena gunakan otak, kalau Anwar sendiri tidak berani membela diri dia dihadapan Mahkamah ALLAH dengan bersumpah laknat saperti Saiful, mengapa pula rakyat mahu diperlembukan untuk membela Anwar di jalanan!

Inilah sepuluh perkara yang perlu direnungkan oleh umat Islam dan rakyat Malaysia semua dan seluruh dunia! Sebelum mike semua membuat kesilapan untuk membela Anwar di Mahkamah jalanraya, tanya diri mike dulu, mengapa Anwar tidak menggunakan peluang sebaik-baiknya untuk membela diri dia sendiri dalam Mahkamah? Mengapa Anwar tidak mahu menyerahkan pembelaan dia kehadapan Mahkamah ALLAH?

Malah teman cabar pengikut taqsub Anwarinas, sila adakan solat hajat perdana secara besar-besaran. Panggil lah Tok Guru Nik Aziz atau Haji Hadi Awang menjadi imam. Mintalah doa hajat kepada ALLAH, tunjukkan, dan buktikan siapakah pembohong sebenarnya, Anwar atau Saiful! Kalau Saiful bohong, berdoalah kepada ALLAH supaya turunkan laknat kepada Saiful serta merta!

Tetapi kalau Anwar berbohong, dan memang dia telah meliwat Saiful, mohonlah doa dan hajat kepada ALLAH supaya melaknat Anwar, dan menurunkan bala kepada para pengikut Anwarinas yang masih taqsub dengan Anwar! Berani yop? Teman cabar mike semua yop!

Pokok pangkalnya, kalau Anwar, bini dan kawan-kawan dia sendiri tidak membela Anwar dalam Mahkamah, mengapa mike semua rela dan redho diperlembu dan dikaldaikan untuk membela Anwar Ibrahim di Mahkamah jalanan!

Terkedu ChinaDOLL nampak belalai,
digenggam geram ditiop kuyop,
Kalimah ALLAH dah pun dema gadai,
Mahkamah ALLAH dema takutlah yop;

Dalam kondo belalai belayar,
depan belakang lubang digali,
Anwar bernafsu nak ke Putrajaya,
tapi Sg Buloh makin menghampiri;

Bebas 901 rekaan Anwar

Mahkamah jalanan menjadi medan

Umat dah tahu rakyat dah sedar

09 Januari Anwar wajib ditalqinkan!

Adios amigos, grasias senor!

Wallahua'lam & Wassalam.

Zulkifli Bin Noordin

Rabu
10 Safar 1433 / 04 Januari 2012

PERSATUAN MAHASISWA ISLAM DIPERALAT DALAM BEBASKAN MAHASISWA =GERAKAN SOSIALIS BARU

Posted: 05 Jan 2012 12:30 AM PST




SEJARAH MEMBUKTIKAN PMI IALAH BUDAK SURUHAN PAS DI SETIAP KAMPUS IPTA

SURAT MAHFUZ KEPADA SETIAP PIMPINAN PMI SATU KETIKA DAHULU


SAMA KAN DENGAN PARTI SOSIALIS MALAYSIA DI BAWAH


MUNGKIN INILAH IDOLA KEBANGKITAN SMM DAN APA YANG BERLAKU SEKARANG.
BAPA YAHUDI MODEN YANG BERJUANG ATAS NAMA KOMUNISME

Mohd Syahmir bin Alias, Setiausaha Agung, Persatuan Mahasiswa Islam USM,
2011/2012.
DIKHABARKAN PMI USM AKAN BERDEMO JUGA PADA 5 JANUARI 2012. BENARKAH? ANGKA YANG BERKAITAN 5 ATAU MEI ADALAH HARI KELAHIRAN KARL MARK.

SOALNYA APAKAH ISLAM MAHUKAN KONFRANTASI DAN PEMBERONTAKAN?
SAYANGNYA GENERASI ISLAM YANG MASIH MUDA BERJUANG UNTUK MEMUSNAHKAN SEBUAH NEGARA ISLAM?

APAKAH SALAH KERAJAAN MEMBERI MEREKA PENDIDIKAN SEHINGGA KE TAHAP MASUK UNIVERSITI?

AKHIRNYA KERAJAAN YANG MEMBANTU MEREKA AKAN DIPERJUANGKAN UNTUK DIHAPUSKAN.

PERSATUAN MAHASISWA ISLAM USM ADALAH HARAPAN PAS DAN PARTI PEMBANGKANG UNTUK MEMBAWA KEBANGKITAN ANAK MUDA UTARA. UUM, UNIMAP DAN UITM PMI TIDAK MAMPU UNTUK BERNAFAS.-BK

UPSI:Pelajar Parah Berdemo Cemerlang Akademik?

Posted: 04 Jan 2012 11:00 PM PST

Geng berani mati SMM yang membuat demo di UPSI adalah kalangan mereka yang amat cemerlang dan terbilang.

Kecemerlangan mereka bukanlah didalam bidang akademik sebaliknya cemerlang didalam latihan amali dan praktikal teknik tidor diatas jalan.

Pisau sekali lagi menyeru agar satu suruhanjaya siasatan diraja ditubuhkan agar menyiasat pintu kaca yang didapati menyerang dan mencederakan anak melayu dengan begitu zalim sekali ketika berdemo didepan UPSI tempoh hari.



Kementerian pengajian tinggi harus memberi pengiktirafan yang sewajarnya kepada mahasewel cemerlang ini agar dapat dijadikan sebagai pelajar contoh yang aktif aktiviti luar kuliah.

Para pelajar MELAYU ini berjaya memonopoli 100% kecermelangan praktikal dan amali tidor diatas jalan dan sebagai anak melayu kita harus mencontohi mereka ini . Setuju!?


Nama : Shazni Munir Bin Mohd Ithnin
Umur : 25 tahun

Bekas pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sains Gunaan dengan Pengajian Islam, Universiti Malaya. Ditamatkan pengajian kerana pencapaian kurang memuaskan (CGPA bawah 2.0)


Nama : Ahmad Syukri Bin Kamaruddin
Umur : 22 tahun

Bekas pelajar Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor (KUIS). Tidak menghabiskan pengajian kerana terlalu sibuk berpolitik dan pencapaian akademiknya kurang memuaskan.
Kini bekerja sebagai pegawai khas Ahli Parlimen Subang R. Sivarasa




Nama : Ahmad Syukri Che Ab Razab
Umur : 27 tahun

Bekas pelajar Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS). Diberhentikan kerana pencapaian akademik kurang memuaskan. Meneruskan pengajian di Kolej Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Selangor (KUIS). Namun tidak menghabiskan pengajian kerana aktif dalam poltik kerana pencapaian akademik kurang memuaskan.

Kesimpulan :
  • Mereka adalah pelajar-pelajar IPTA pro-pembangkang yang gagal di IPTA. Tetapi selepas diberhentikan pengajian di IPTA kerajaan Negeri Selangor memberikan mereka 'full scholarship' untuk belajar di IPTS milik kerajaan negeri Selangor.
  • Kerajaan negeri Selangor dikatakan menggunakan mereka untuk menjayakan agenda gerakan politik pembangkang di kalangan pelajar-pelajar junior.-sumber YY

Pisau kata " Allah lindungi pelajar kaum cina dan india daripada pengaruh Anwar"

New Year Joke

Posted: 04 Jan 2012 10:14 PM PST

2 local jokers joined Umno! Thanks to Hussein Hamid, the following laugh seems to suit the occasion!



Of the two, Afdlin is the more famous one...

Link

UPSI Lahirkan Produk Tidur Atas Jalan

Posted: 04 Jan 2012 09:04 PM PST

UPSI berjaya melahirkan bakal bakal guru yang berkemahiran tinggi dalam teknik tidor diatas jalan dan berdemo. Malah produk UPSI atas hasil kacukan hibrid PKR DAP dan PAS ini bakal menjadi pendidik anak anak kita di sekolah nanti.

Ibu Bapa bakal menghadapi tunjuk perasaan,tidor diatas jalan,demo dan rusuhan oleh anak anda jika kemahuan mereka tidak dituruti,Ini semua adalah hasil didikan yang bakal mereka terima dari guru lepasan UPSI yang berkebolehan dan berdedikasi mencurahkan ilmu dengan sepenuh hati kepada anak anda.




Pisau kata " kalau anak sendiri berdemo dan ketegaq memang makan penampaq la jawabnya"

1,000 members left MCA

Posted: 04 Jan 2012 08:45 PM PST

"We can recruit more, let them leave": Who is Soi Lek trying to kid? The MCA leadership's lack of response to the resignation of about 1,000 members led by the party's former Penang and Johor Youth chiefs last week is telling. All we got from the morally-tainted MCA president Chua Soi Lek was "we can [...]


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)