Ayam Menyamar Jadi Jantan?

---

• Ayam Menyamar Jadi Jantan?
• full transcript of LGE-CSL debate (from LGE)
• Makan Pasir Pun Kaya-Raja Pasir
• Project 366 - Week 7 (Feb 12 - Feb 18)
• Penang Kiasu States: Kereta Di Sita Tengah Malam.
• Imam flings shoes at judges over eviction case
• Budaya vandalisma semakin berkembang
• http://www.4shared.com/document/sF59gRdR/Where_Did_I_Come_From_b
• I believe
• Gov’t intervention causes medical costs to go up
• ‘Najib, Taib must apologise for embarrassing us’
• PAS Berbi'ah Dengan Segala Macam Masaalah
• PAS Bersama Tangisan Palestin Tapi Dalam Pelukan Anwar!
• TTDI market traders in the dark
• Skandal 10Billion ,Guan Eng Selindung Fakta,Gagal Jawap
• Kanta mata warna singkap diri

Ayam Menyamar Jadi Jantan? Posted: 23 Feb 2012 01:12 PM PST Pelik, ayam jantan milik Huang li (47), tak pasal- pasal boleh bertelur, setelah tujuh ayam betina "temannya" dipotong untuk dimakan. Huang yang memiliki peternakan di Desa Chumiao, Mengcheng, provinsi Anhui mengaku memelihara satu ayam jantan unik itu bersama sejumlah ayam betina. Ketujuh ayam betina sudah habis dimakan dan hanya tinggal seekor ayam jantan. Berita keunikan ayam itu akhirnya tersebar luas dan mendapat perhatian ilmuwan setempat. "Mereka ingin mengetahui apakah memang sejak awal ayam betina tapi penampilannya seperti ayam jantan atau benar-benar berubah menjadi betina ketika semua ayam betina habis," tambahnya. Yang jelas, kata Huang, ayam itu membantu membangunkannya setiap pagi, dan boleh saja ayam betina yang diperlakukan sebagai ayam jantan. Pisau kata " ayam tomboy? geng LGBT ?"

full transcript of LGE-CSL debate (from LGE) Posted: 23 Feb 2012 09:17 AM PST Press Statement By Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng In Kuala Lumpur On 23.2.2012. _____________________________________________________________ Chua Soi Lek's Refusal To Release His Own Debate Transcript In Bahasa Malaysia And English Will Only Expose Himself To Non-Chinese Speaking Malaysians That He Focused On Making Personal Attacks,Lies And Adopted Divisive Tactics During The Historic Mandarin Debate On "Is The 2-party system becoming a 2-race system"? ______________________________________________________________ Selangor MCA's police report against me yesterday only highlights MCA's desperation to cover up MCA President Chua Soi Lek's performance of making personal attacks, lies and divisive tactics during the historic Mandarin debate on 18.2.2012 "Is The 2-party system becoming a 2-race system"? Making another 10 or 100 police reports against me by Selangor MCA can not hide the fact that Chua has so far refused to release his own debate transcripts in Bahasa Malaysia and English. Chua Soi Lek's refusal to release his own debate transcript in Bahasa Malaysia and English will only prove to non-Chinese speaking Malaysians that he focused on making personal attacks, lies and adopted divisive tactics during the historic Mandarin. Not only did Chua made personal attacks against me during the historic debate on 18.2.2012, even his predecessor Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat was also not spared. I had refused to trade personal insults or indulged in personal attacks with Chua during the debate as I believed that a debate should be a contest of ideas, ideals and principles. Chua knows releasing his own debate transcripts will only expose himself as indulging in baseless personal attacks against me as well as Ong Tee Keat. Worse Chua will also be exposed for his divisive tactics and lies against the record of PR. MCA and Chua are using their control over the BN mass media to whitewash Chua's personal attacks and twist the outcome of the debate into lies. Even the Star was compelled to apologise to me in their enthusiasm to whitewash Chua's performance. Facts and figures do not lie. Let the debate transcripts speak for themselves. In the interests of historical veracity, Chua should emulate what I have done by releasing the debate transcripts in Bahasa Malaysia and English for the benefit of non-Chinese speaking Malaysians. Yesterday I have released my debate transcripts in Bahasa Malaysia. Today I release my debate transcripts in English which clearly showed that unlike Chua I did not launch any personal attacks against Chua's past or record. Lim Guan Eng ============================================================= Introduction, Lim Guan Eng: First of all, I would like to thank the organisers for this live televised debate. Televised debates mark a new chapter in Malaysian political democracy because it is an important element in the democratisation process. I hope that from today onwards, televised debates will be a common phenomenon in the Malaysian democratic system just like in Europe and the United States. Thus, I believe what Malaysians really want to see is a debate between Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, to see who really deserves to be Prime Minister. Whoever isn't brave enough to debate, don't hope to think of becoming Prime Minister. Chua suggested that DAP is being used by PAS. If we observe UMNO amongst the Malays, UMNO claims that PAS is being used by DAP. Therefore, I believe this self-contradictory statement is a dirty tactic employed by BN. I wish to stress here that Pakatan Rakyat component parties, be it PAS, PKR or DAP, we never use each other. We are only prepared to be "used" by the people! At the same time, we are also not anti-Malay or even anti-non-Malay; we are merely against a government that is riddled with corruption! I feel that today's theme, "Is A Two-Party System Becoming a Two-Race System?", is quite strange. Because, there already exists a two-race system at the present moment, and we want to change it into a two-party system. This two-race system, which is BN's long-held ideology since Independence until now, has BN dividing the people into Malays and non-Malays, this is a 'divide-and-rule' strategy. The Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had had said, "I am a Malay first, then only a Malaysian." Is this 1Malaysia or is this Bluff(Tipu) Malaysia? This is indeed a two-race system. On the other hand, a two-party system is premised on ideology, ideals and principles, without racial discrimination because we are all Malaysians. In BN, UMNO only takes care of the Malays, MCA only takes care of the Chinese, MIC only takes care of the Indians, Gerakan… I don't know takes care of who???…. That's BN with their "you take care of your race, I take care of my race". That is a two-race system! Conversely, in a two-party system, we are all brothers and sisters, we take care of each other; every Malaysian is part of one big family! UMNO always proclaims "Malay Supremacy". Does the MCA not see this, hear this or feel this, and thus are not brave enough to stand up to them? Hence, we still hear that the Chinese are immigrants(pendatang) and do not deserve equal rights. PR is different from BN. We don't want "Malay Supremacy", what we want is "Rakyat(People) Supremacy"! Anwar not only speaks about "Rakyat Supremacy" in front of non-Malays, but he also says the same thing to the Malays. Will UMNO leaders dare to stop proclaiming "Malay Supremacy" and instead support "Rakyat Supremacy". When the people or PR leaders expose abuse of power or corruption and question the Police or the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, we are accused of challenging the Malay institutions – this is a two-race system, because corruption does not discriminate against the colour of one's skin. The late Ahmad Sarbaini, the customs officer who lost his life, is he not a human being? Pakatan Rakyat wants to abolish corruption, BN wants corruption. PR wants to ensure leaders who are honest and a government that is clean, including public declaration of assets of government leaders, open tenders, now this is a two-party system! Most importantly, the real corrupt officers must be caught, and not slandering the poor innocent Teoh Beng Hock. My opponent always says: "Other races become government, Chinese become opposition". This is totally wrong. In truth, "BN MCA becomes opposition, PR DAP becomes government" is what worries MCA. Not only does the Chinese support PR to bring change, the Malays do so as well, if not PR would not have been able to gain 40% Malay support and the political tsunami would not have happened. Without the political tsunami I believe I would not have the opportunity to stand here as the Chief Minister of Penang and Chua would not have the chance to become the President of the MCA. In a democratic system, a two-party system requires alternating governments. Let the BN fall and become the opposition, let PR rise to become the government. If PR does not rule well, then the people have the right to change again after five years. This is a two-party system, with alternating parties ruling, only then will the people have a better life. Question from the moderator: The Chinese community have welcomed a two-party system since 1980. If we refer to the 2008 results, the amount of votes given to BN and PR are about the same. This shows that half the people are happy with BN while the other half harbour hopes for PR. Does this mean that both parties have achieved a two-party system? How would your party seek to win the other half? Answer from LGE: If PR is given the chance to rule, our policy will bring benefits to the people. Today, inflation is rising, our income is not enough to make ends meet. We want to reduce the people's burden. If we become government, we will abolish the North-South Expressway and the Penang Bridge tolls. We will also increase oil royalties from 5% to 20% for Sabah and Sarawak. I know, since Penang gave RM100 to senior citizens every year, BN has copied. Not only BN has copied, MCA too has copied. So, besides thanking Chua, they(MCA members) should also thank the Penang State Government. If we take power at the federal level, we wish to inform all 2.1 million senior citizens in the country that we promise to give RM1,000 every year. These are the benefits of alternating governments. They are judged on their policies. We want to become a policy state not a police state. Answers for the Q&A session: LGE: Was that Perak Exco Ma Han Soon? I think we all know that when PR was the government in Perak, it was PR which started the initiative to grant land to schools and permanent land titles to new village residents and the poor. However, since BN became government, this has been abolished. Because of that, I feel that you have no right to question anyone. On the question of the Penang State Government making empty promises, I wish to stress that we have fulfilled all our election promises. On why the Sungai Nyior toll has not been abolished, we must remember that this is under the power of the Federal Government. We have not taken over the Federal Government, so be patient…. When we have taken over the Federal Government, of course we will abolish it, as well as the North-South Expressway and the Penang Bridge tolls. However, even though we have not abolished the Sungai Nyior toll, we have built a road to bypass the toll plaza, so it is the same, no need to pay toll. The success of Penang, I believe has been proven. After March 2008, everyone can see, touch and feel the changes that have happened. In Peninsular Malaysia, the first dual lingual road signs in Chinese were erected in Penang. The first Tamil road signs in Malaysia are also in Penang. For the first time in Penang, we also have road signs in Arabic, all due to the success of the PR Government. Penang's success in combating corruption is also notable, resulting in praise from Transparency International. If there are people who are guilty, we will not let them get off scot-free, and the fact the Penang has zero corruption has been recognised by an international organisation. When we say we don't take money, we don't take money. Thank you. Questions to each other: CSL: We hear populist policies, giving RM100, abolish this, abolish that… Can you, on this stage, tell us what is the community development and economic model of Pakatan Rakyat so that Malaysia can escape the low-income trap and achieve high income status, including implementing the promises in the Buku Jingga? LGE: I believe this is the difference between myself and Chua. He is not anxiously concerned about corruption, while I am very anxiously concerned about corruption. We need to have a framework for administrating the country's affairs. What is the plan to bring economic development? I wish to use the Penang model as an example. This is the result of the Penang Pakatan Rakyat State Government's practice of "money makes money". This system stresses four key aspects. First, "money raise money" through cooperation between the private and public sectors (Public Private Partnerships) in executing development projects. Secondly is "money earns money" through an open tender system, the State Government can cut costs. Third is "money creates money" through innovation and creativity. Finally, "money saves money". If we don't take money, for sure there will always be money to be saved. Therefore, the Penang State Government has enjoyed a budget surplus every year for four years, and is able to give back to the people through our Senior Citizens Programme with RM 100 every year, and RM1,000 one-off to beneficiaries of senior citizens who pass away. Even newborn babies get RM200 under our Golden Child Programme. When Barisan Nasional was ruling Penang, not a single sen was given, but with the principle of "money makes money", we have given benefits to the people of Penang, and this is actually an anti-corruption dividend! In addition to that, in Malaysia, I believe that if we abolish corruption, we will be able to save a lot of money and give back to the people. This is our promise, Penang is the best proof! If we dare to fight corruption, we will definitely have money. Thank you. Answers to the Q&A and Conclusion, LGE: First of all, I would like to rebut certain accusations that the Penang State Government has not given land to Chinese schools. I feel this is not only lying to yourself but also lying to others. This is because we have proof, even the schools can verify that the Pakatan Rakyat Government has given land. Don't forget, the Pakatan Rakyat State Government has now institutionalised allocations to all school streams, not just Chinese schools, also Tamil schools, Sekolah Agama Rakyat or religious schools and private Chinese schools. Before, there was nothing, and now they receive yearly allocations. Here, I would like to make a plea to all Malaysians. Be brave enough to change, we must not surrender our destiny to fate. We deserve equal opportunities. No longer must we kneel down and beg. We must boldly rise up with dignity to seek change! We do not want to be lied to anymore, change now! Look, the MCA President too has changed, for the first time he is debating with the Rocket. But this debate is not as important as whether MCA dares to say "No" to UMNO? Why say "No" to UMNO? Because UMNO uses racial and religious sentiments, including supporting PERKASA to inflame and divide the people! Secondly, UMNO abuses laws that impinge upon human rights. UMNO condones corruption, Shahrizat's case with the cows is only the tip of the iceberg. Even more serious, in the last 10 years, RM1 trillion of illicit funds (corruption money) has been illegally taken out of the country. How do we account for this? This is why we want a two-party system. As what the former MCA President Ong Tee Keat described MCA's cooperation with UMNO. He said, "Before at least MCA could eat the leftovers dishes on the table, but now the best they can hope for are the breadcrumbs." Many Malays have not enjoyed the fruits of development of this country. They don't get RM250 million to raise cows, because most of the "good fruits" have been eaten by BN cronies leaving to the people only the "dead" fruits. The problems faced by the Chinese community, I believe everyone knows there are many problems. Besides the problem of the private school certificates (UEC) not being recognised, Chinese schools do not get enough allocation funds, teachers who are not proficient in Chinese are sent to Chinese schools, there are also problems with temporary teachers that have not been resolved. But issues of unequal access to the economy and jobs, I believe are not only faced by the Chinese, but also by other races. That is why we have to take this chance to work together with the other races to bring about change. What we stress now is about the future of our children. The future of my generation has already been robbed by BN for 50 years, don't let our children's future be robbed as well. Therefore, we are awaiting the chance to change. This morning before I came, I told my daughter that if given the chance, I would like to be the voice of her generation. I hope to provide policies that will enable you to live here and not to migrate. We must give importance to talent. Remember, only by appreciating, emphasising and choosing talent can the future of Malaysia be bright and prosperous. Look at South Korea, in 1970, their average per capita income was only USD260 in 1970 Malaysia was better, we had USD380 then. However, South Korea has now surpassed Malaysia. Now, our average income is USD7,760 while South Korea has reached USD20,000! Why has South Korea become a high income nation while Malaysia has failed? The main factor is that South Korea is a democratic country, practices a two-party system, has an alternating change of government. Therefore, if we want to change, if we want Malaysia to become a high income nation, we must be brave to rise up for change, we must be brave to realise a two party system. This path is not easy, but I wish to remind everyone, our cooperation with PAS, PKR is based on a written manifesto. It has been announced in public, PAS has their ideology, DAP has our ideology, but don't forget, PAS has never caused the death of a single Chinese. Let us be strong, will ourselves to change. Even though the path may be difficult, but for the sake of our younger generation, we must complete this journey of change! Tweet Facebook LinkedIn Tumblr Stumble Digg Delicious

Makan Pasir Pun Kaya-Raja Pasir Posted: 23 Feb 2012 07:00 AM PST Selepas Pulau Pinang dengan skandal RM10Billion,Skandal Pasir di Selangor makin panas.Tapi inilah Selangor pimpinan pakatan makan pasir sampai jadi kaya. SELCAT dengan CAT sama saja,penipu,pembohong dan penyamun! SELCAT bermaksud Jawatankuasa Pilihan Khas Mengenai Keupayaan, Kebertanggungjawaban dan Ketelusan adalah satu jawatankuasa yang ditubuhkan oleh kerajaan negeri Selangor untuk memantau sebarang salah laku ataupun penyelewengan yang dilakukan oleh mana-mana pihak yang melibatkan kerajaan negeri Selangor. Anggota Selcat ini terdiri daripada Azmin Ali, Haniza Talha, Saari Sungib, Edward Lee Poh Lin, Sulaiman Razak dan Ismail Sani keduanya daripada BN Selcat juga pernah digunakan oleh kerajaan Selangor untuk mengadili kes BALKIS yang melibatkan perbelanjaan yang mencecah ratusan ribu ringgit yang diadakwa sebagai penyelewengan.Selcat juga pernah dikatakan akan menyiasat perbelanjaan boros 56 wakil rakyat BN ketika zaman pemerintahan Barisan Nasional. Semalam Faekah Husin mengeluarkan kenyataan bahawa kerajaan negeri menjemput Noh Omar untuk hadir memberi keterangan ketika prosiding berkenaan isu pasir dijalankan oleh Selcat. Agaknya Selcat dah lupa beberapa perkara. Pertama Selcat harus menjemput 9 orang kakitangan yang dipecat kerana merekalah first level yang patut dipanggil kerana dipecat selepas mengadu berlakunya penyelewengan di dalam KSSB. Betul kata Suhaimie Kota Raja bahawa mereka dipecat atas alasan disiplin tetapi itu semua hanya satu strategi untuk membuatkan mereka terkeluar daripada KSSB. Kedua adalah krebiliti SELCAT itu sendiri, Hasan Ali ketika menjadi Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor pernah mempertikaikan kreabiliti SELCAT. KLIK SINI Ketiga apakah yang mampu dibuat oleh SELCAT sekiranya terbukti ada penyelewengan berlaku? Selcat ini wujud hanya untuk menjaga kepentingan kerajaan negeri Selangor dan juga mencari kesilapan orang lain. Natijahnya mereka sendiri tidak mempunyai kuasa untuk menjatuhkan hukuman terhadap sebarang dakwaan. Keempat adalah Khalid Gagap masih belum menjawap apa bentuk tindakan yang akan diambil oleh beliau andai terbukti wujud penyelewengan di dalam KSSB. Noh Omar memberi 3 tindakan yang perlu diambil.Pertama MB akan letak jawatan, Keduanya memecat Exco dan Adun yang terlibat dan ketiga membubarkan dun Selangor. Aku yakin Noh Omar tidak takut untuk memberi kenyataan tetapi apa yang penting adalah kreabiliti badan induk tersebut untuk menjatuhkan hukuman. Noh Omar mahu Selcat diteruskan bukan bermakna dia mengakui kreabiliti Selcat tetapi mahu supaya rakyat tahu bahawa Selcat hanyalah satu jawatankuasa menjaga kepentingan kerajaan PKR Selangor. Walaupun ada 2 wakil BN didalam Selcat tetapi sebarang keputusan akan dibincang terlebih dahulu sebelum di bentangkan ketika prosiding Selcat. Apa yang lebih afdal adalah penubuhan satu jawatankuasa diraja supaya semua pihak boleh memberi keterangan dan sebarang hukuman diakui oleh semua pihak, Andai Selcat membuat keputusan ianya akan dipertikaikan kerana penubuhan Selcat jelas menunjukkan mereka akan mempertahankan kerajaan Selangor. Satu soalan yang mash belum terjawap- Kenapa MB tak beri kenyataan. Kenapa perlu Yaakob Sapari dan juga Faekah yang bagi kenyataan. MB Gagap dah takut nak keluar kenyataan ke atau dah kene sound dengan DAP? Lihat video dibawah pada minit ke 11 hingga ke 14 tentang apa tindakan yang MB Gagap kena ambil. sumber:KGC Pisau kata " pakatan Selangor makan pasir sampai muntah jugak"

Project 366 - Week 7 (Feb 12 - Feb 18) Posted: 23 Feb 2012 04:42 AM PST February 12 - It was quite tasty.  February 13 - Dual-purpose fridge magnet! ♥  February 14 - Valentine visit February 15 - Valwell!!!  February 16 - At the end of the day. February 17 - My Peruvian Mirror, Mirror on the Wall!  February 18 - I love you and you!

Penang Kiasu States: Kereta Di Sita Tengah Malam. Posted: 23 Feb 2012 04:35 AM PST Inilah akibat jika mempersoalkan regim DAP,Regim DAP Pulau Pinang sebenarnya tidak boleh ditegur.Ketua menterinya cukup terkenal dengan ultrakiasu,begitu juga dengan para rasis chauvanis ahli DAP yang lain. Jessie Ooi hanya membangkitkan persoalan kenapa pihak majlis menyita kereta ditengah malam,tambahan di kawasan bank. Banyak kes apabila pelanggan bank pergi mengeluarkan wang di mesin,sekembalinya ke kereta didapati hilang rupanya disita. Bayangkan golongan perempuan dengan wang gaji yang baru dikeluarkan terpingga pingga ditepi jalan tengah malam keretanya di sita oleh regim DAP.:klik sini Penyelaras Barisan Nasional bagi Selayang dan Pengerusi Beliawanis MCA Selangor, Jessie Ooi, yang menjadi tumpuan kritikan selepas beliau mengemukakan soalan semasa debat antara Presiden MCA, Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek dan Setiausaha Agung DAP Lim Guan Eng baru-baru ini, merayu agar keluarganya tidak dijadikan sasaran kritikan. Beliau berkata, ada segelintir pihak yang memuatkan gambar anak dan anggota keluarganya dalam laman web, yang menjejaskan dengan teruk imej keluarganya. "Memandangkan mereka semua tidak bersalah, tolong jangan jadikan mereka sasaran kata-kata yang berniat jahat. Jika anda ada sebarang kritikan, tolong halakan kepada saya dan jangan diapa-apakan anggota keluarga saya," katanya dalam kenyataan yang dikeluarkan di sini hari ini. Ooi berkata, gambar anak dan anggota keluarganya telah dimuatkan dalam Facebook dan tindakan seperti itu membawa ancaman terhadap keselamatan mereka di samping gesaan supaya memulaukan syarikat kepunyaan keluarganya. "Untuk melindungi keselamatan dan nama baik anggota keluarga dan diri saya sendiri, saya membuat laporan pada 20 Februari 2012 di Ibu Pejabat Polis Gombak. "Sudah tentulah kami akan mengambil tindakan sewajarnya untuk melindungi diri kami," katanya. - BERNAMA Ada orang makan angin di Italy,rakyat tau juga siapa yang belanja,rakyat pun tau jugak itu orang punya bini cuci muka RM70ribu siapa yang belanja. Cybertrooper DAP sudah hentam Jessie Ooi,dulu siapa yang cakap jangan main gutter politic,wah..sekarang sudah halalkah? You mau main gutter politic..just bring it on la .. Pisau kata "dont forget your love from Sabah"

Imam flings shoes at judges over eviction case Posted: 23 Feb 2012 02:44 AM PST Imam flings shoes at judges over eviction case 6:15PM Feb 22, 2012 An imam, who had been ordered to be evicted from his premises because of disciplinary problems, took the unprecedented step of throwing his shoes at three judges on the Federal Court bench today. The incident took place just after 10am when the three-man bench led by Chief Judge of Malaya Justice Zulkifli Ahmad Makinuddin (right) rejected imam Hoslan Hussain's application to hear his appeal. This followed an objection raised by the Federal Territory Islamic Affairs Council (MAIWP) lawyer Zulkefli Che Yong that Hoslan's affidavit was filed outside the timeframe allowed. Hoslan, who was not represented, was standing at the row of tables where the prosecutors and lawyers are seated. The imam is said to have argued with Justice Zulkefli and asked him to be lenient, but the judge replied that the bench had to allow the preliminary objection as this was in accordance with the law. Justice Zulkefli tried to pacify Hoslan, but the imam did not want to listen any longer and suddenly took off his shoe and flung it at the judges' bench. The shoe narrowly missed the head of one of the judges, but then Hoslan took off his other shoe and threw it - which hit the deputy registrar of the apex court. The two other members on the panel were Justice Suriyadi Halim Omar and Justice Zaleha Zahari. Following the incident, police on duty at the court grabbed hold of Hoslan and calmed him down.The court then adjourned the matter and as the lawyers left, Hoslan held a prayer in court. It is learnt that the three-member bench did not initiate any contempt order against Hoslan. The deputy registrar is said to have asked mainstream media not to report the shoe throwing. MAIWP wants to evict imam According to MAIWP's lawyer Zulkifli, the council wanted to evict Hoslan, an imam rawatib or an appointed by the community, who has been with the Ar Rahimah mosque in Kampung Pandan since 2008, because of disciplinary problems. He said Hoslan (left) refuses to read the stipulated khutbah as required by MAIWP and that there were also other complaints against him. "However, he does not want to leave his quarters in the mosque premises, resulting in MAIWP  applying to the High Court to evict him, and the court in Kuala Lumpur issued an order for him to be evicted on June 16 last year. "Hoslan appealed to the Court of Appeal and it upheld the High Court decision on Sept 20 last year, resulting in the case coming up to the Federal Court today," Zulkifli said. He said Hoslan's notice of motion to the Federal Court was not filed within the stipulated time. Hence, the lawyer said he had been instructed to raise a preliminary objection under the Courts of Judicature Act as well as the Federal Court Rules, under which applicant's affidavit should also be filed, within 30 days of the motion being filed. "This is the procedure and Hoslan did not comply with it," Zulkifli said. The imam tells a different story  (Seals: You Must Read this) Contacted later by Malaysiakini, Hoslan said his grouse was not eviction but justice, for he had been highlighting corruption and abuse of funds at the Ar Rahimah mosque and these issues had not been attended to. He claimed that he had made numerous reports to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and also to the police over the abuses, but there had been no action. "In fact, Umno extends its  powers on the mosque. It was Umno's hands behind this and it used MAIWP to remove me. "Prior to being an imam rawatib, I was the bilal at the mosque. I have been imam since 2005, but I refused to leave because the mosque committee has been abusing its powers and funds," Hoslan claimed. "I did not have legal representation in all the court cases. It is not that I cannot afford it, but MAIWP has suspended my pay. "I want to set the record straight on corruption and abuses in the mosque. I believe such abuses are taking place in other mosques in the Federal Territory, especially those controlled by Umno." A staunch supporter of PAS Hoslan also admitted to being a staunch opposition supporter of the opposition, especially PAS, and said he helped out in every by-election campaign the party was involved in. At the height of the Bersih 2.0 saga last year, he said, the Friday sermon at his mosque advised the people not to attend the rally. Upon hearing the sermon, Hoslan said, he lifted his robe in protest before the congregation, to show them his yellow Bersih T-shirt. He said one of the abuses he discovered was that of a renowned restaurant paying monthly fee of more than RM3,000 to the mosque – but the money did not reach the mosque committee. The money was allegedly paid to a mosque committee member who approved the restaurant's use of land belonging to the mosque. "Despite such blatant abuses, there is no action despite me reporting the matter to the mosque committee. Where is justice?" Hoslan asked. On the shoe-throwing incident today, Hoslan said he was merely making his point on the court's failure to uphold justice and turning a blind eye to such abuses. He said the courts and the justice system were flawed and had failed, especially since former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad had been running the country. "Yes, I threw my shoes, the first nearly missing the bench and the second struck the person below (the deputy registrar). I do not believe our courts can uphold justice," Hoslan said. Following the incident, he added, he lodged a police report at the Putrajaya police station and that he would personally submit a copy of the report to inspector-general of police soon. source: http://www-us.malaysiakini.com/news/189968 The world That I see

Budaya vandalisma semakin berkembang Posted: 23 Feb 2012 04:15 AM PST Apabila terfikir kembali tentang isu penyenaraian Felda, saya tidak dapat melihat apa kah sebabnya yang kerajaan mahukan penyenaraian ini dilakukan dalam apa juga keadaannya. Saya tidak faham kenapa setiap badan-badan serta agensi kerajaan yang maju sentiasa berakhir dengan kerosakan. Dulu MAS merupakan sebuah syarikat penerbangan yang premium jika berbanding dengan syarikat-syarikat penerbangan lain di dunia ini. Oleh kerana MAS begitu berjaya di bawah pengurusan Saw Huat Lai dan kemudiannya dikembangkan lagi oleh Tan Sri Aziz Abd Rahman maka setiap mata mereka yang meleleh air liur telah menjualkannya kepada Tajuddin Ramli. Sejak penyerahan MAS kerpada Tajuddin Ramli MAS telah menjadi apa yang kita lihat pada hari ini. Dibawah pengurusan Tajuddin, MAS telah kerugian berbillion-billion ringgit sehinggakan kerajaan terpaksa melakukan 'bail-out' dengan membeli kembali saham-saham syarikat itu dengan harga yang sama yang dijual kepada Tajuddin sebelumnya. Kerugian yang dialami oleh MAS begitu besar sehinggakan MAS tidak lagi boleh bangun sampai ke hari ini. Hari ini MAS telah dipergunakan oleh Air Asia, dalam satu 'share swapping' yang sangat menyedihkan mereka yang memahami keadaan sebenarnya. Tindakan "share swapping' ini pula diberikan sokongan oleh pihak kerajaan (Khazanah). MAS mendapat hanya air lelehan dari Air Asia sahaja. Kita tidak boleh berbuat apa-apa kerana mereka yang telah kita berikan amanah untuk menjaga kepentingan rakyat itu tidak jujur dan hanya memikirkan kepentingan diri mereka sendiri. Banyak lagi insiden-insiden buruk seperti ini telah dilakukan oleh pihak yang berkuasa. Sekarang ini penjenayah kolor putih ini sedang cuba untuk memerah dan merosakkan Felda pula. Di mana sahaja ada wang yang besar di situlah pemimpin berlumba-lumba untuk mengambil kesempatan. Sesungguhnya Felda tidak payah disenaraikan terutamanya KPF itu. Jika sungguh niat pimpinan Najib ini ikhlas dan mahukan juga ada penyenaraiannya elok disenaraikan anak-anak syarikatnya yang banyak telah membuat keuntungan besar dalam mana KPF itu sendiri membeli saham dalam syarikat IPO yang baru itu. Ini lebih bermakna. Tetapi masalahnya niat kenapa hendak menyenaraikan Felda serta koporasinya itu tidak dapat kita bayangkan. Tentulah ada niat yang terselindung hanya diketahui oleh mereka yang mempunyai niat yang tersembunyi itu. Apa sahaja agensi kerajaan yang membuat banyak keuntungan di situlah ramai pemimpin berlumba-lumba untuk merosakkannya. Kadangkala saya terfikir juga yang pimpinan kita merupakan kumpulan yang suka melakukan vandalisma terhadap semua perkara yang baik dan kukuh yang telah dilaksanakan oleh pimpinan yang terdahulu. ATAU dalam bahasa kasarnya mereka ini merupakan kumpulan 'makhluk perosak' yang tidak ingin melihat kejayaan kepada rakyat dan negara ini. Usahkan hendak membina kejayaan yang baru….yang sudah berjaya pun hendak dirosakkan.

http://www.4shared.com/document/sF59gRdR/Where_Did_I_Come_From_b Posted: 23 Feb 2012 01:13 AM PST http://www.4shared.com/document/sF59gRdR/Where_Did_I_Come_From_by_Peter.htm?aff=7637829

I believe Posted: 23 Feb 2012 12:45 AM PST I'm reposting Anas's Zubedy's "I Believe"..... Dear Brother and Sister Malaysians, I believe… 'Until we give NO FREE RIDE to every candidate, no matter which party they may represent, we cannot stand proud and say "WE, THE RAKYAT, ARE IN CHARGE".' I believe that a single voter can make a difference. You and I, we are powerful! I believe that we, the rakyat, are in charge. I believe that our votes and actions count for everything. I believe that as we, the rakyat, move for the good of the nation, weare changing our nation for the better. I believe that we the rakyat are more powerful than all the party machineries put together. I believe we can win when we do the right thing. I believe that God is with us when we are genuine, truthful and have faith in Him. I believe. I am looking for fellow believers. I am writing to you as a fellow Malaysian, a fellow believer with a heart for Malaysia. Let's find ways as rakyat to work towards changing Malaysians and Malaysian politics for the better - with love, care and mindfulness; not with anger and hatred. It is our collective responsibility to ensure we improve the quality of our lawmakers, regardless which party they are from. We are the real third force. This moment in time calls us as rakyat to act to make sure we get only our best people to represent us in parliament. When we get the best, it does not matter which party they are from. If we grant the mandate for unfit Malaysians to become our leaders, we are directly responsible for letting our nation fall to neglect. So let's work. Let's work to make sure only the smartest, uncorrupted, hardworking, sound and healthy candidates are elected. I need to convince you that when we believe, we can make a difference… This is what we can do to ensure we have good leaders after the next elections: Make an appointment with the potential candidates for your voting area and go meet with them. Go individually, or better still gather a few friends/family from the same voting area and go together. Before you meet them, make sure you have decided what you want to ask from them. List down your wishes. Remember to use your Reason, Conscience and the Constitution as a guide. For an example, go tohttp://www.letusaddvalue.blogspot.com/2012/02/my-letter-to-nurul-izzah.html When meeting your potential candidates: Things to bring Your wish list from your MPs/ADUNs A video recording device (your phone camera will be good enough) What to do: Choose to be respectful. Tell them you have a list of what you look for when deciding which leader to vote. Tell them that it will help you decide how to vote if they promise to keep this 'halal contract' between you, a rakyat, and your political representative. Be clear: let them know that regardless of your political inclination, you will choose whoever is better at representing the rakyat. If anything, you want to be guided only by Reason, Conscience and the Constitution. Show them your wish-list and ask them to choose which of the requests they agree with. The more they agree with, the more likely you will vote them. Record a video of their clearly stated promise to keep to these wishes. Request that they say, 'I, _________, if elected as an MP/ADUN, promise to (items on the list which they agree with)'. This is how we can cause the ripple effect: Once you have the recording, spread the news - post it up to your Facebook and link it to your Twitter, blogs, and other social media platforms. As a way to share it with other like-minded Malaysians, link the video back tohttp://www.facebook.com/pages/No-Free-Rides/254891967906392 This 'halal contract' is your lasting proof and accountability check. If, at any time after elected, your MP/ADUN fails to keep his promise, you can follow up with this proof to remind him, and the rest of the nation, of his/her promises. One rakyat in each voting area is all it really takes. You can be that person. When, because of our actions, we make this country better, one day we will look back and know that the reason we made a difference was because we believed. I believe. Do you? anas zubedy

Gov’t intervention causes medical costs to go up Posted: 23 Feb 2012 12:37 AM PST The proposed 1Care for 1Malaysia healthcare transformation plan is a hot topic of discussion in the public. It is said that a certain percentage of monthly income is to be contributed by the employees and the employers towards the plan, although the details are still on the drawing board. First of all, we must distinguish [...]

‘Najib, Taib must apologise for embarrassing us’ Posted: 23 Feb 2012 12:23 AM PST The fiasco involving government-hired UK consultants FBC Media and television networks BBC, CNN, and CNBC has compromised the integrity of our leaders, claims PKR. KUCHING: Sarawak opposition has called on Najib Tun Razak and Taib Mahmud to resign following British Broadcasting Corporation's (BBC) apology for allowing its widely viewed 'World News' programme to be used [...]

PAS Berbi'ah Dengan Segala Macam Masaalah Posted: 23 Feb 2012 12:00 AM PST Bi'ah khawarij bukan bi'ah sebarangan,bi'ah ini mengundang celaka didunia dan akhirat. Amaran dan ugutan ini sudah tersebar luas dikalangan ahli khawarij PAS. Bagi mereka adalah tidak menjadi masaalah,hati totok suci mereka tetap akan mendokong aspirasi parti khawarij sebagai tungangan rasmi DAP dan PKR. Menurut seorang ahli parlimen PAS,katanya Bi'ah ini bukti tahap kesetiaan ahli PAS yang tidak boleh dikhianati,Bi'ah ini juga mencerminkan keimanan mereka dalam memperjuangkan wadah Islamiah dan dalam masa yang sama kalangan pemimpin PAS yang kurang bersetuju dianggap tidak beriman dan dianggap gunting dalam lipatan. Bi'ah khawarij sudah sampai ketahap menjadi satu kultus ajaran sesat.Memandangkan ia adalah arahan dan fatwa dari ulama mereka sendiri maka ia akan menjadi ikrar mereka sehingga ke lubang kubur. Pas sepatutnya mewajibkan calonnya berbai'ah menolak mana-mana pemimpin yang terpalit dengan video seks; tuduhan liwat; menggadai kalimah Allah; membawa idealogi pluralisme serta menyokong keselamatan Israel. Bekas Naib Ketua Angkatan Muda Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), Mohd. Zahid Md. Arip berkata, ini kerana terdapat pemimpin sedemikian dalam pakatan pembangkang dan tindak-tanduk tersebut jelas bertentangan dengan ajaran Islam. "Saya ingin mengingatkan Presiden Pas, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang jangan sampai menang sorak Islam tergadai. Sepatutnya mereka berbai'ah menentang pemimpin yang terpalit dengan masalah moral, mempersendakan Islam dan menyokong Israel. "Jangan kita berbai'ah hanya kerana kemaruk kuasa politik dan saya melihat tindakan terdesak ini menunjukkan Abdul Hadi sendiri tidak percaya kepada kesetiaan calon Pas," katanya dalam satu kenyataan kepada Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini. Semalam Abdul Hadi mengumumkan bahawa Pas mewajibkan setiap calonnya yang bertanding pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 nanti berbai'ah dan sesiapa yang melanggar bai'ah tersebut akan celaka dunia dan akhirat. Pada pilihan raya 2008, calon Pas juga diarahkan berbai'ah mencerai isteri masing-masing dengan talak tiga jika mereka meninggalkan perjuangan parti itu sehingga mendapat kecaman hebat daripada pelbagai pihak, kerana bai'ah tersebut menganiaya kaum wanita. Dalam pada itu, bekas Setiausaha Angkatan Muda PKR, SD Johari Yasin berkata, tindakan Abdul Hadi bukan sahaja jumud, malah memberi gambaran buruk kepada orang bukan Islam kerana mereka melihat langkah itu sebagai tidak demokratik. Pada masa sama, beliau juga percaya tindakan mewajibkan bai'ah itu bukti Pas sebenarnya berada dalam keadaan terdesak ekoran sokongan orang Melayu terhadap parti berkenaan berada pada tahap terendah selepas pilihan raya 2008. "Pas bimbang bukan sahaja tentang sokongan orang Melayu tetapi takut calon mereka beralih arah kerana Pas sedar, mereka sering tunduk kepada Parti Keadilan Rakyat, DAP termasuk dalam isu akidah sebab itu digunakan kaedah autokratik seperti ini," katanya.-utusan Pisau kata " khawarij dah bi'ah dengan Ds Omega"

PAS Bersama Tangisan Palestin Tapi Dalam Pelukan Anwar! Posted: 22 Feb 2012 10:00 PM PST Apa jenis manusia khawarij PAS,dah jadi manusia dua alam,lagaknya serupa Anwar. Jantan betina semuanya dibedal. Munafik,khawarij PAS bersama tangisan rakyat Palestin tapi dalam masa yang sama berada didalam pelukan Anwar Israel,sebantal berpelukan dalam selingkohan haram mereka. Apa ini kategori lacuran jenis baru kah? Sokong Palestin tapi sayang penjilat Israel.Khawarij,korang ni nak mana satu? Nak Palestin atau nak Anwar? Sokong Anwar bermakna sokong Israel.Jangan sampai satu hari nanti deligasi khawarij ke Palestin diludah rakyatnya dek kerana menyokong Anwar. Pisau kata " Ada sumber rapat pimpinan atas PAS dah gaduh kenapa nak tunggu lagi dalam pakatan"

TTDI market traders in the dark Posted: 22 Feb 2012 05:13 PM PST To go or not?: The Taman Tun Dr Ismail market is a landmark building in the area. Source: http://thestar.com.my/metro (By S. PUSPADEVI, 22/2/2012) The TTDI Market Traders Association wants the Kuala Lumpur mayor Tan Sri Ahmad Fuad Ismail to take a clear stance on whether the Taman Tun Dr Ismail market will be redeveloped. "Why are we kept in the dark? We do not know what the status is now. The mayor was quoted by two newspapers on Feb 14 that the market would be demolished and the area would be redeveloped into a mixed commercial area, as it was obstructing the MRT line. "It is not true that a majority of TTDI residents want the market to be destroyed as claimed by the mayor in his press statement. We have so far collected 10,000 signatures from residents and traders opposing the demolition of the market," TTDI Market Traders Association chairman Jenny Loo told reporters at the TTDI market yesterday. "So far, the mayor has not met us to discuss how we feel about the matter. Everything has just been via the media," said Loo, adding that traders and residents are unhappy with the fact that their opinions were not being taken into consideration. Ramli Ismail, who is the adviser to the traders association, said Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin had previously mentioned that stakeholders would be included in future discussions and their views on the development of the site taken into consideration. "Why is the mayor saying this now? The traders will not budge from the market and we will stand by this decision, from the beginning till the end. "Most of the residents have objected to the redevelopment plan, saying that this market has existed in the area since 1985. "Where else can we can get a wet market now?" said Ramli, adding that TTDI market had undergone a great deal of development to reach its present status. Ramli said the association had recently received a letter from the KL mayor requesting for a meeting to be held on Feb 27 at the TTDI Community Hall. According to Ramli, the letter did not mention the agenda for the meeting. KL Prima Consult Sdn Bhd, the developer of the project; Tetuan RSP Arkitek Sdn Bhd; TTDI Market Traders Association; and TTDI Residents Association have been invited to attend the meeting. "After we visited the DBKL information centre, we found out that the market is not in the way of the MRT line. So what is happening?" asked Ramli. Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng, who organised the press conference at the market said the traders and residents should be given the chance to voice their opinions on the matter. "They are very confused with the situation as the mayor had not been accessible at any point in time to meet with them to discuss the issue at length. "The traders and residents have the right to know whether the market will be demolished," said Lim. It was reported in The Star on Jan 6 that Raja Nong Chik had confirmed that DBKL had received an application to redevelop the site of the market, but no decision had been made on the proposal. Raja Nong Chik had also mentioned that stakeholders would be included in future discussions and their views on the development of the site taken into consideration. DBKL received an application from WCT Sdn Bhd and Perdana Padu Sdn Bhd to redevelop the market site. On New Year's Eve, about 100 traders and residents had staged a peaceful demonstration in front of the TTDI market against the demolition of the market. Related news: Traders quiz market makeover http://www.mmail.com.my/story/traders-quiz-market-makeover

Skandal 10Billion ,Guan Eng Selindung Fakta,Gagal Jawap Posted: 22 Feb 2012 05:00 PM PST Ketua menteri regim DAP Pulau Pinang,Lim Guan Eng cukup terkenal dengan lidah bercabang dan putar belit fakta. Skandal RM10billion tanah yang dijual kepada Ivory Sdn Bhd telah mendedahkan berlaku penyelewengan,ketidak telusan dan berlaku ketidak cekapan mengurus aset kerajaan negeri hingga menyebabkan kerajaan negeri kerugian berbillion ringgit. Unsur penyelewengan juga terdedah apabila didalam proses pembelian tanah tersebut dikatakan sebagai tender terbuka namun berlaku direct nego ,Malah Guan Eng bersama keluarganya pergi bercuti ke Italy:klik sini turut dikhabarkan dibiayai oleh orang kuat Ivory Sdn Bhd. Video dibawah mendedahkan persoalan yang masih gagal dijawap oleh Lim Guan Eng,apa perlunya beretorik dengan jawapan politik sedangkan kerajaan negeri dan DAP hanya perlu jawap berdasarkan fakta. Apa perlunya berselindung jika tidak melakukan penyelewengan . KP Umno Pulau Pinang mendedahkan putar belit Lim Guan Eng . Pisau kata "From Sabah With Love"

Kanta mata warna singkap diri Posted: 22 Feb 2012 04:48 PM PST Tempoh hari, saya menonton teater 'Parah' di Kuala Lumpur Performing Arts Centre (KLPac). Pementasan itu ditulis oleh dramatis Alfian Sa'at dan disutradarakan oleh Jo Kukathas. Dibintangi oleh Iedil Putra, Farah Rani, Branavan Aruljothi dan Gregory Sze, 'Parah' mengisahkan tentang empat sahabat berbilang kaum yang mempunyai hubungan begitu erat. Namun, hubungan ini dicabar apabila mereka membaca novel 'Interlok' karya Sasterawan Negara Datuk Abdullah Hussain. Apa yang dibaca telah menimbulkan persoalan-persoalan sukar di antara mereka, mengenai sejarah bersama dan juga identiti peribadi mereka. Isu kaum mula mencarik persahabatan, meregangkan silaturahim dan mula sedar akan perbezaan di antara mereka. Watak Hafiz, Melur, Mahesh dan Kahoe mula melihat diri mereka melalui kanta mata warna, walhal selama ini mereka buta akan itu semua. Persoalan yang ditimbulkan dalam 'Parah' bukan sahaja berlaku di dalam dunia sebenar, tetapi berlaku dengan berleluasa. Bangsa, kaum, warna kulit dan agama sering kali dijadikan isu dan garis pemisah di antara kita. Kita terlalu cenderung untuk mengenakan kanta mata warna dan melihat semua perkara melalui retina bangsa dan kaum. Seperti apa yang dikatakan oleh Melur dalam 'Parah', isunya bukan lagi tentang sastera, bukan lagi tentang sebuah novel tetapi tentang hubungan antara kaum dan juga politik. Akhir-akhir ini kecoh dengan suatu peristiwa di sebuah restoran makanan segera yang terkenal dengan ayam gorengnya. Sebuah video telah dimuat naik ke laman web Youtube yang menunjukkan bagaimana seorang pelanggan telah kononnya dipukul oleh pekerja restoran tersebut. Siapa betul dan siapa salah, apa sebab perkara ini berlaku tidak dapat dipastikan. Apa yang pasti adalah dua pihak telah bergaduh dan mengakibatkan kekerasan fizikal. Jika tidak boleh diselesaikan dengan baik, ia mungkin menjadi kes polis. Malangnya, kejadian itu dilihat melalui sudut kaum. Pelanggan Cina dipukul oleh pekerja Melayu. Perbincangan yang berlangsung di alam maya disulami dengan sentimen dan polemik perkauman. Si Melayu yang kaki pukul. Si Cina yang kurang ajar. Kita tidak lagi melihat mereka sebagai individu-individu, tetapi sebagai 'wakil' bangsa mereka masing-masing. 'Mangsa' Cina harus dibela. Pekerja Melayu ada justifikasi mengapa 'mangsa' dipukul. Kemudian, ahli politik pula masuk gelanggang. Sidang media dengan si pelanggan. Isu kaum kini menjadi isu politik. Ini bukan kali pertama. Setiap perkara yang berbangkit dan menjadi topik nasional sentiasa akan mempunyai sudut perkauman. Walaupun perkara picisan seperti jenama roti sekalipun telah dipesongkan apabila sesetengah pihak memboikot satu jenama roti kerana bangsa pemilik jenama tersebut. Sampai bila harus kita melihat isu melalui sudut kaum dan bangsa? Bukankah kita semua sebenarnya sama, rakyat Malaysia yang mewarisi negara ini? Bilakah kita akan sedar bahawa kita mempunyai takdir yang dikongsi bersama? Ini bukan lagi tanah orang Melayu semata-mata; bangsa lain bukan pendatang dari negeri Cina dan India. Saya akui, menonton 'Parah' kadangkala menimbulkan rasa kurang senang di dalam diri saya, kerana ia sebenarnya mencerminkan realiti kehidupan kita di Malaysia. Bahawa walaupun kita mendabik dada kepada dunia bahawa kita 'sememangnya Asia', walaupun kita bangga kononnya kita semua satu Malaysia, sebenarnya kita masih belum membuang kanta mata warna kita. Dan selama itulah negara ini tidak boleh merealisasikan potensinya. *pertama kali diterbitkan dalam Sinar Harian pada 13 Februari 2012 Filed under: Racial issues

You are subscribed to email updates from xBlog ☪ Fabulous Sociopolitical Blogs To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610